srsly anybody know legally if one could make and sell a Free 15 or Free Fitteen or Free JJ or Jennings t's or hoodies to sell online or via twitter?
I can appreciate the board's love for UT and Jennings, but, in my view, one half game suspension is pretty lucky and I will enjoy Jennings as a Vol as much as I can for the last two quarters he's wearing the orange. Still one of my top 5 favorite Vols ever. I hope the third and fourth quarter are slants and post routes for Jajuan every single play no matter the score.
half a blatant injustice is still injustice. He didn't stomp on his head. I don't see any punishment for the vandy player that went at his helmet as he walked away, or the vandy players that cleared the bench. As someone else said, either they believe he intentionally assaulted a down player and only gave half a game, or they are don't know and are punishing him for appearances. neither is acceptable. And I want an explanation for why vandy players clearing the bench or laying hands on him as he walked away is being excused.
The Vanderbilt player's punishment is playing for Vandy. Plus, they aren't going to a bowl to be suspended from. Sorry, Jennings did it and it was on purpose. I think the Vol tinted glasses are affecting people's sensibilities here. It reminds me of the time in which this board excoriated Indy for saying Amari Cooper would be a better pro than Marquez North. It was laudable to defend the Vol against the Bammer, but it clearly wasn't true. Now, like I said, my opinion of Jennings is unaltered. He's still a demigod and, for a non-religious fellow such as myself, this is no small praise.
Idk if he did it on purpose or not. Idk how you look at any video we’ve seen and judge intent. At all.
Since he is now suspended, I hope he comes out and says he did it on purpose. It helps us catch more heat as the heels of college football
You can’t. I’m not gonna say he didn’t do it on purpose but nobody can look at that and say for certain he did. Nobody.
I can say for sure that he did not intend to physically harm him. either it was an unintentional contact, or it was intentional and he did no physical harm whatsoever with a cleat across the face. I.e., he didn't harm him while extremely able to do so. someone help me out and point to the flaw in my logic. either way, it wasn't a stomp or a step.