- He'd take an A- offensive line with D- running backs and receivers over a C- offensive line with A- RBs and receivers - Peyton added a lot to the game: --Pre-snap stuff --Keeping it simple - The pendulum has started to swing back some to help defenses. He seems like a bright guy. [video=youtube;lvX8diWgriA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvX8diWgriA[/video]
For an old ****er, Brady still does it as good as anybody. If you gave me the choice for next season (sans suspension,) I probably take Brady but wouldn't really care if I got Rogers instead.
I wouldn't. That offense, as it should be, is tailored to Brady, but it's forced to be bottled up some because he really sucks down the field now. They throw 47 times a game underneath off of the pick and roll. If offensive interference ever becomes a focus, Billy Ball offense will take a huge beating.
If I was getting hit from lack of blocking I'd think the same. As a coach I'd rather be putting the ball in the hands of a game changer with average blocking.
He gets to run the offense he runs. I get your point; he doesn't have the arm he used to have, and he doesn';t have Rogers' arm. But if I need a drive, or a game, or a season, I'm happy with Brady. The guy still runs that offense to perfection. This is a point I can understand.
A D- NFL running back isn't a game changer even with great blocking. He'd be serviceable with great blocking and get you fired with average blocking.
Well, I don't know about this. I think that you have few A running backs in the league, and then the rest of them are basically all C's. Guys picked up off the waiver wire in week 13 because of a slew of injuries seem to hold their own surprisingly well.
I agree with Rodgers too. With good blocking, you can get 4-5 yards per carry from just about anyone. It may not be Adrian Peterson, but most guys who make it to the professional level are exceptional athletes.