rexvol is annoying with his cut and paste stuff, but screw Rucker and all the other idiots trying similar approaches to info.
Riddle me this. If Rucker writes a story for the Times Free Press, I pay my 75 cents for the paper and read his story, and then post the summary of said story online -- with attribution -- I have done nothing wrong, correct? So, why is this any different? One pays money for content. They then transfer that content to the public, while attributing the story to the writer. What am I missing other than a violation of some message board honors system?
I'm honestly not sure. I would assume this involves copyrights or whatnot. I honestly don't know. I just saw it and laughed when rexy automatically came to mind.
he pretty much dropped off my radar after i put him in his place. why did she leave? he opened a restaurant?