1st Amendment & Boobs

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by cotton, Sep 19, 2017.

  1. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    The parts where he says first amendment.
     
  2. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    Irony is not necessary comedic. Violence frequently is comedic.
     
  3. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    "Waffles, tacos, bourbon, ice, first amendment, football."

    Look at all the discussion we've had!
     
  4. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    In what way is violence comedic?
     
  5. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    Seriously?
     
  6. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Yes. In what way is violence comedic? What do you find humorous? That another is in pain? Or that someone is causing pain?

    I want to see the humor, through your eyes.
     
  7. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    My eyes? Have you watched TV before?
     
  8. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    What does television have to do with you finding comedy in violence?

    I'm assuming you are trying to draw a parallel between reality and fiction? But since the news may depict real violence, I cannot be certain.

    Explain, if you would. Through your eyes.
     
  9. NorrisAlan

    NorrisAlan Founder of the Mike Honcho Fan Club

    Two words:

    Three

    Stooges
     
  10. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    If that were true, acting and reality would have to be equivalent. Depiction and reality would have to be equivalent.

    Would you agree?

    Because if that is violence, then depicting rape must also be rape. Would you not draw distinction there? Then how can you not concerning violence as well?
     
  11. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    Comedies are depictions or other similar forms of professional entertainment.
     
  12. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Yes. Comedies and comedic aren't the same thing.
     
  13. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    I don't know if seeing them together will help, or not.
     
  14. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

  15. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Relating to comedy. That's the key.

    That means your statement reads exactly thus:


    Irony is not necessary comedic. Violence frequently is of or relating to comedy; humorous.

    What is does not say is:

    Irony is not necessary comedic. Violence frenquently is of or relating to the professional depiction of comedy; humorous depiction.

    They are two different meanings entirely. Demonstratably different.
     
  16. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

  17. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    No, I am wrong. That's exactly what you are saying.

    Not humorous, just depiction. Sorry. I am wrong.
     
  18. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

  19. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    You used comedic wrong in relation to irony, so I thought you were using the definition that pertains to humor.

    So we have to start over at the irony and implication of humor, not "comedic." I'll reply to that quote so we can start over.
     
  20. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Correct. Irony implies comedy (comical, humorous, funny, ha ha; not depictions.). Violence does not.

    The reboot.
     

Share This Page