I have no idea how Snopes leans. It seemed to provide more context than I got from the Fox link and it was not behind a paywall. There was more detail and it was more recent. I am not a fan of paid provocateurs on any level.
It definitely works that way if you give them large sums of money. Do you just blindly donate to causes?
Why I often dont bother collecting multiple links to prove a point when there’s no amount of them regardless of quality or legitimacy that would suffice.
You should always be evaluating the credibility of sources. If you were not before, that might be how you got to linking me conservative think tanks. I don't send you the daily kos or huffpost now do I?
Evidence was in the article. Concrete evidence he helped find protesters. You just don't like the source or how it's laid out. That's on you. I did my job.
Let's see, Fox News had to settle for a huge amount of money after lying about the 2020 elections. That's a fact. Now they're being sued by Hunter Biden for allegedly defaming him. Wonder how that will turn out.
In the old days, people subscribed to the newspaper which leaned toward their preference. Nothing much has changed from that perspective.
To be clear I didn’t mean as literally as ~some~ believe Soros funds protests. But having feds be involved in far right groups helping convince gullible morons into driving to DC for J6 isn’t nothing. And if you think that is even remotely far-fetched or conspiratorial you simply are not paying attention. Maybe that’s not interesting to you and that’s why you don’t know, if so that’s fine.
I wouldn't say "no way." Now, would you say there is no way that liberal or progressive think tanks could be right?
