ANTIFA Goes to Auburn

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by Tenacious D, Apr 19, 2017.

  1. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    So bias, stupidity and pride, then.

    Political affiliation is not part of the protected areas for hate crimes, so, not similar there. Nobody is saying she shouldn't be charged with a crime, if she has in fact committed one. Pretty solid strawman coming from the guy lamenting them.

    The issue is still with the stupid commentary. So just in what way were these violent acts different from other violent acts? Because there was a loudmouth boaster?

    Stop the press. Just in: loud mouth braggart starts fight.

    Wow. Thank god we got that headline out there. But no, please do tell how this was so much different. Ya know, because there were people involved that aren't "your" people.
     
  2. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    I'm just trying play your game since you don't want to deal with reality. Youre downplaying her words, I'll let you answer for that but I've got a pretty good idea why.

    "Your" people. What the Hell does that mean? You're doing nothing but attacking me personally instead of arguing a real point, which leads me to believe you have no real point.

    I don't think women should be having fist fights with men, I don't think people should have their speech oppressed. I don't think people should incite violence against others who have differing opinions. You call this dumb and biased commentary. Well ok then. I guess I am what you say I am. That's how it works now.
     
  3. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Yea, I am. Because you refuse to answer questions. And since you refuse to answer questions, I cannot attack your logic, as you have provided none. As a result, I must assume you cannot. That leaves me with just you. You can change that, by addressing the simple questions I have asked.

    So today words matter? I thought based on Trump discussions only actions mattered?

    Here is the reality, you made a stupid comment based on nothing more than your bias towards this group and the people involved. Period. That's reality. Had this been a fight amongst bros, you wouldn't have cared. This was a fight among politically active people that don't match your world view, and suddenly they don't know their role. That's reality. And that point hasn't waivered and not have I been shy in reminding you of it.

    And why exactly should women not fight men? Is it your role to protect them? Again, I ask, what about 110 pound men against 240 pound men? Should they also sit on the side lines?

    I'm trying to get to the bottom of just how big a boy a man gotta be in order to for the fight to be "ok" in GahLee's eyes. And that is what I mean by "your " people. Because clearly the non-meek female who doesn't need your "protection" isn't one of your people.
     
  4. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    What questions? Like what's the difference between a simple fight at a football game and a brawl/riot whatever you want to call it at a march with political affiliation?

    So today words matter? I assume by this you mean my mentioning of you just seemingly fixated on me personally instead of the actual issue. That's a you problem.

    What is the exact comment that you keep calling stupid? Is it "yappy little feminists" because you also seem fixated on that. Most people would call her worse. She's allowing a fringe group to be proxy for an enormous amount of people. Unbeknownst to them. That is until the proclamation on social media about getting 100 Nazi scalps and then helping incite violence.

    And why exactly should women not fight? Another bell ringer of a question that I won't answer. Because men are better at it, there is no need for women to be fist fighting. I'm not advocating that they shouldn't get involved, just leave the fighting to the meatheads.

    I have no idea why you keep using ridiculous hypitheticals to try and make a point. You've mentioned the 110lbs man vs a 240lbs pound man thing twice. Which is baffling because it was dumb then but you doubled down. First off, how many 110lbs men are there? If you're going to create a straw man, make it believable. It doesn't have to be linear to be fair, I would have accepted like 150 vs 200. I wouldn't advise any man weighing 110lbs (save trained fighters, had to mention them as the outlier before you brought them up as a fringe argument) I wouldn't advise a man that size fighting anyone. Let alone a man that's more than twice his size. But, you're still a man and as man you reserve that right to an ass kicking. Women don't. Ever. And they should stop seeking it out.
     
  5. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Yes, fundamentally, what is the difference? What is worthy of your public disdain here, but isn't at any other time? What is the fundamental reason for taking exception to these fights?

    i'm fixating on you personally because:
    1. You posted a stupid comment
    2. You continue to defend it as not
    3. You followed it up with sexist commentary, which I find also stupid
    4. You've tried to twist your original flawed comment that was clearly not about a single person into multiple, and brushed it off when called on it.
    5. You've provided no argument

    That's why I'm "focused" on you.

    The reason I keep mentioning 110 lb men is because a 110 man is physically similar to those women. But you have no problem with them fighting. So what exactly is the "biology" reason for women not to fight? Because clearly it isn't a physical thing.

    "Better at it." Ok. What biological thing makes a man a better fighter than a similarly sized woman. See it's not a straw man. I'm trying to figure out just what it is in your mind that procludes women from fighting, when you have no problem with similarly sized men doing it. I'm still fighting your argument. I'm just trying to figure out what it is, other than the prefix "wo."

    There doesn't seem to be one, though. Hence my reason for "focusing" on you.
     
  6. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    I said I didn't see any victims
     
  7. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Take a look at the signs and messaging associated with the groups she was protesting and confronting. There are plenty of videos showing these groups inciting each other.
     
  8. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    Give an example.
     
  9. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    You ask a lot of.dumb questions and appears that you're having a hard time understanding my position. I think I've made it pretty clear how I feel about it. Not sure why you're struggling with it. At any rate, I'm done with it, have your opinion, I'll have mine. Moving on.
     
  10. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    Well, you played her out to be a victim, my guess is you didn't know.anything about her intent, you, like most people, just saw a women being punched.
     
  11. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    wwjnd?
     
  12. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    I also fail to understand this.
     
  13. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    Violence is wrong. Lawlessness is wrong. The usurpation and or denial of the free exercise of someone else's rights is wrong.

    Anyone attacking anyone else is wrong, and should see themselves and their actions be quickly and summarily condemned by all reasonably-minded persons.

    If anyone goes looking for violence, they will surely find it.

    If they later become overwhelmed by the same violence they had sought and/or instigated, I will strongly disagree with and condemn it, but will have little sympathy for your self-made plight.
     
  14. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    I'm not struggling to understand your position at all. It's very simple; it's one of sexism. That's it. You have no reason why women shouldn't fight, other than the fact that they are women. That's your entire position. It's very simple to understand.
     
  15. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    nazi salutes directed at the antifas.
     
  16. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    I seriously do not intend to paint her as a victim. She was obviously looking to scrap, like everyone else that wasn't sitting in the park and talking (and there were some on each side doing that, it just doesn't get coverage).

    Do you know who the guy was that punched her? His background seems more notable than her pornography career.

    EDIT: I removed sucker from this post. I concede that "sucker punch" has a connotation that isn't accurate here. Still, full on punching her when she was clearly unprepared and thoroughly licked. Seemed unnecessary. That's a riot for you.
     
  17. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    Could be some trolling going on there. I've never personally seen a person and thought "nazi". That's not to say that there aren't people who identify themselves as that but they have to exist in pretty limited numbers.
     
  18. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    Yeah. I'm a sexist for wanting women to not get punched in the face. Saying men are better at it isn't sexist. It's a fact. Why you're pretending otherwise is beyond me.
     
  19. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    What's the scoop on the dude? I've seen other portions of the rally where he and another man were facing off. Looks like a guy wanting trouble. Makes no sense to me. I never wake up with the urge to fist fight.
     
  20. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    He is Nathan domigo, a leader and founder of a white supremacist group.
     

Share This Page