when we haven't had a dominant receiver in ages? Yes, we had Hunter, but one WR being good in years doesn't make you WRU Now, all the rednecks repeat this phrase as if its truth. Now, we have coaches still talking as if we had WRs balling out all over the field last few seasons Call me when another WR breaks 1100 yards receiving, then I might give it the ok
What do you expect? The coaches aren't going to come out and say that we are no longer WRU due to the fact that our WR don't excel at an acceptable rate.
"It's not about receptions, it's about reception and I like to think of coach DeBord as a big antenna for this program. He makes things much clearer." -Butch
Four former Tenneessee wrs caught tds last year: Moore, Hunter, Patterson and Rogers. Rivera if you want to include TEs. And those are just guys from 3 years ago.
Eventually, the recruits will realize it once other coaching staffs point out the facts It can also be used against you if you don't produce the stats to claim the title We might as well claim QBU, RBU, LBU and DLU while we are at it. Had as much or better success at those positions as WR
So that makes us WRU? I guess no other schools put WRs who catch TDs in the NFL? Hell, one receiver at Alabama had a better season than many of ours combined
Other than Miami I think Tennessee has put more wrs in the league than any othe program, so yeah wru it is.
USC is right up there, too. Tennessee has had a ridiculous run of consistently putting wrs in the NFL and it's going to continue with North, Pig and Pearson