there evidently wasnt a memo, which is what the discussion is. An investigation about a leak could be as simple as "who leaked the hire". Not really sure what your point or motive is except to deflect from falling for a bogus tweet. Your fake money means nil
When the AD and SID take time to say its bullshit, yes. And prefer it over taking word random twitter guy with unnamed source and proof just to be pissed off about something else. You have wads of panties to be washed since we didnt hire rapevan Franklin.
Your jimmies are rustled. It isn’t a “random Twitter guy”. People report stories all the damn time with unnamed sources so that’s weak as [uck fay]. Lmao. They wouldn’t be sources anymore.
trying to figure out which is dumber: 1. being an AD and commenting about investigating leaks at all or 2. being a fan believing a new AD who brags about not having leaks doesn't care about there having been leaks and isn't investigating it.
Noy really. You are the one whining and calling a man a liar over something minor, that apparently didnt evem happen, just to be angry. Call it like i see it.
It happened in some form or another. Whether it was a different medium or an attempt to expose leakers.
Or #3, creating #2 out of thin air. He obviously cares and probably wants to know who. So what. The tweet said a memo from the AD was sent. AD and SID call him out saying its not true and i believe them until i see proof, which the tweeter cant provide.
2 things seemingly contradictory can be true. DW is an arrogant elitist control-a-holic And he will likely be a good AD
Or, it could be that you're supposed to run an AD like this and we don't know because our AD has been a giant [uck fay]ing mess for going on 30 years now