Does football gaming ability = Football knowledge? - VolNation The basic premise is "if you are good at football video games then you have great football knowledge"
I'm good at Call of Duty so I would naturally have fit in with Easy Company at D-Day. I swear I would have raped those Germans at The Battle of the Bulge.
This is dumb beyond belief, but it explains a lot of what is said by many there. Sad on many levels. Using this logic, Van Halen should be an opening act for my "band".
I don't understand why Dooley just doesn't put the fastest WR at QB and run five wide all the time then just scramble laterally every play.
They can be useful as a basic teaching tool if you have a kid that will pay attention. You can get them to learn basic formations and positions with it. It's the only way I could get my cousin to sit still when he wanted to learn about football.
I took SMU from preseason 118 to the national title on NCAA 2003 or 2004. Obviously I should have gotten a call before Dooley.
Did the same thing (may have been '05). Also Rutgers and West Virginia (before the Rich Rod era took off). I'm an unrivaled program builder.
Whichever version it was, I just remember they had a stud running back on that team. He ran for 2,500 and won the Heisman.
If you thought that thread was good, you should really check this one out. 2012 Vols Line v. 1982 Washington Redskins Hogs - VolNation
Dude needs to check the weights of our magnificent 2005 OL that couldn't get a half yard against Vandy to win the game.
