I think Bortles can be pretty good if he goes to the right coach. I think he needs a lot of work, but if he could learn under a guy like O'Brien for a year before being tossed out there as the starter, he'll be an above average QB. I never thought Gabbert would do shit. Teddy Bridgewater is going to struggle at first, because he doesn't have a cannon arm. NFL defenses are a lot faster than Big East defenses, but I think he'll be okay in time. Personally, I think Manziel will be a guy that gives his head coach a stroke. He'll do something amazing and the next snap do something completely retarded, a lot like Mike Vick.
I'd honestly rather have Garropolo or Carr late in the second round than any of the "Big 3" prospects in the first round.
One of these days Johnny Manziel, Chip Kelly, and Mike Leach are going to be in the same room. And that room will be kidbourbon's sex dungeon.
The only person to play more than one year and have fewer att/g is Tebow. Tebow averaged 12+ more carries a game. The only people to average fewer rushing attempts were Bradford, Moore, & Weeden (Who had 6, 7, & 17 more pass attempts/g, respectively). McCarron was definitely a "Don't **** this Up" QB as opposed to a "Go win it for us" QB.
I would take Bortles way over Gabbert. That guy wasn't even good in college. Brad Smith was without question better and he had to switch to WR.
Yeah, I figured it was a joke. I wasn't able to digest much of the chart invol posted. I was scared away by its girth.
I'm not saying Bortles sucks. I don't think he sucks. I just think -- and confidently so -- that both Teddy and JFF are better than him. Somebody who watched college football and comes to a contrary opinion has outsmarted themselves into full retardation.
