Wait, are we pretending there are no conservative voices in the editorial section of the Times? That the reason Cotton's piece was objectionable because of some conservative bias? Or, there are no liberal figures in which a particular viewpoint would be objectionable and thereby rejected? If a liberal advocated using the military to shut down/monitor the gun brandishing protests of a couple weeks ago by those, largely, conservatives, marching on the Michigan capitol and other activities, on the editorial page then there is an example. But, I don't remember this happening. I do love a good conservative victimization complex, though. Few do it better.
FAKE NEWS! ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE! I don’t give one bucket of warm piss for W’s endorsement of anyone or anything.
