Obama Admin Lies About Paying Ransom to Iran

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by Tenacious D, Aug 3, 2016.

  1. VolDad

    VolDad Super Moderator

    IP and Lochte know how to spin a story.
     
  2. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Spinning it would be taking the release of us citizens and calling it a ransom because we also paid a legitimate debt while engaging in diplomatic exchange for the first time in decades. That's spin. If it isn't spin, where was this outrage in January? No new info came out.
     
  3. VolDad

    VolDad Super Moderator

    Preach it Lochte; somebody might believe you.
     
  4. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Not even remotely accurate. You're better than this.
     
  5. VolDad

    VolDad Super Moderator

    Not really; I am watching the jackass right now continue to spin his stupid shit.
     
  6. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    I'm watching as well.
     
  7. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    All this side story stuff really doesn't take the spotlight off your boy.

    What was a "good week" for Trump is an average week (minus the need for apology) for every other politician since Caesar.
     
  8. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    Wasn't a ransom. Just one of those typical situations where they were holding something that was ours against our will and wouldn't release it without us paying them. Totally different.
     
  9. CardinalVol

    CardinalVol Uncultured, non-diverse mod

    No no, you missed it. This was separate from the 400m. They were going to be released anyway. The two deals just so conveniently happened to be negotiated at the same time.
     
  10. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Exactly. We were enormously compelled to repay that debt. We've been falling over ourselves for years to pay it.

    So, we've got this politically minded sack of turds in the WH with an even dumber SoS and they wouldn't have avoided the optics of the ransom if the could have?

    Willful stupidity from the condescending one.
     
  11. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Without a doubt.
     
  12. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    So, we're the one nation that can decide not to abide by decisions made by a body we agreed to allow to decide international disputes?
     
  13. justingroves

    justingroves supermod

    Oh, that makes perfect sense. I don't see how anyone could mistake it for a ransom
     
  14. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Horsecrap. We owe nothing to people taking hostages and we are justified in doing so. Without doubt.
     
  15. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    Except that a body we agreed long ago to arbitrate such disputes said we owed them their money. It's Rounders: "Pay that man his money."
     
  16. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    I love that logic. "We don't have to abide by court decisions because of unrelated issues that piss us off." That'll work.
     
  17. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    Which in no way changes the fact a body we gave the authority to make such decisions said we owe the money. I love the idea that we get to pick and choose when we abide by decisions made by a hand picked court.
     
  18. CardinalVol

    CardinalVol Uncultured, non-diverse mod

    Except the agreement was settled out of court.
     
  19. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    It isn't a freaking court. The logic says if you take my hostages, forgiving my debt is the best thing that might happen to you.

    The logic that bows to the mullahs is for losers.
     
  20. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    We haven't given any body anything binding.

    You about to tell me why the delay?
     

Share This Page