That's the argument I was making? Care to put some more words into the mouth of that straw man? I look forward to the next time you go on a tirade about the argumentative tactics of this site.
Were you not invoking the second amendment in saying the word "bear" means carry? If I'm mistaken and you were just dropping a random factoid with no intention of referencing the second amendment's alleged regulation via ID as support for the regulation of voting via ID, I sincerely apologize. I have no idea what you were getting at then, or what "bear" has to do with anything at all. Explain.
A voter ID law does not require an ID to vote. It requires an ID to receive your ballot. You can burn your ID before filling out your ballot and casting it. Glad we're on the same page.
Ludicrous that the numbers have been verified by people looking for a particular result and you're touting it.
I figured, somewhere after the 400,000th iteration of "words have meaning" that you might be interested in the meaning of words. Your post implied an incorrect synonymous relationship between bear and own.
You don't believe that dude thoroughly investigated 1 billion votes? I mean, at a few seconds per vote that'd only take a few centuries.
Should probably submit to a background check and 3 day waiting period. I guess at that point the election is over so its not really feasible.
North Carolina's voter ID law was struck down as discriminatory. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...arolina-voter-id-law-discriminatory/87728254/
