I get that, but you wouldn't have a house without a foundation. You wouldn't have walnuts/almonds without the trees. You don't have life without the foundation of cells.
I'm not telling her what to do with her body. I'm more interested in the growing person inside of her body.
Take it a step further. The foundation of the foundation is the mother. Without the mother, you couldn't have the foundation for the fetus. Ergo, women should never be allowed to die, be killed, executed or otherwise bothered until after their ability to provide the foundation has passed.
Not that I remember. Just because I didn't help create you, does that mean that I shouldn't be concerned if your life were ended beyond your own actions? Why are we worried about other people being murdered if this is the case?
If the foundation is paramount, as in, you can't have a house without a foundation, or a pecan without a pecan tree... Then you also can't have the foundation for the fetus without the foundation present within the mother. Therefore all issues regarding female life and reproductive means prior to an age when reproduction becomes impossible is disrupting that foundation, and we must conclude is taking away life. If we are going to say a foundation is enough, because, can't have that life without the foundation.
You don't own the random old guy that lives down the street that gets murdered either. Why should we care about that?