3. Yes. If the account is true, does it discount the “public” aspect of the event, as it’s now a known actor?
Whew, from fake to breaking: https://www.npr.org/2018/07/17/6296...ltration-was-an-aspect-of-russian-2016-attack Was just so fast on the story I sharted, is all.
Breaking? What is this breaking, exactly? Does this qualify as quality reporting: Not only do I not know where you’re going with this, I don’t think that you do, either.
And if she is convicted of breaking the law, I hope she is justly punished. I hope she receives justice, whatever that means.
If you think I am driving somewhere in particular, you are mistaken. If you think I find the nature of the madlibs of people, party, and orgs tantalizing, you are correct.
I can see that, but when candidate whoever says they want to outlaw a gun that looks ugly, I don't want to vote for them, I think the average citizen feels the same way.
I think the particulars are close enough that the average person wants to keep their gun and everyone else be unarmed.
Rohrabacher says it is all crap, but also thinks he should have immunity in relation to Russia because of his position. Okay, but no one has accused you of anything yet... odd. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/rohrabacher-criticizes-bogus-indictment-butina
Maybe Paul Erickson is Person 1. He fits. Note this article from 2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/03/us/politics/trump-putin-russia-nra-campaign.html
The idea that the NRA is in bed with the Russians is perhaps the most ironic thing I have heard in a long time.
