Yes. In what way is violence comedic? What do you find humorous? That another is in pain? Or that someone is causing pain? I want to see the humor, through your eyes.
What does television have to do with you finding comedy in violence? I'm assuming you are trying to draw a parallel between reality and fiction? But since the news may depict real violence, I cannot be certain. Explain, if you would. Through your eyes.
If that were true, acting and reality would have to be equivalent. Depiction and reality would have to be equivalent. Would you agree? Because if that is violence, then depicting rape must also be rape. Would you not draw distinction there? Then how can you not concerning violence as well?
Relating to comedy. That's the key. That means your statement reads exactly thus: Irony is not necessary comedic. Violence frequently is of or relating to comedy; humorous. What is does not say is: Irony is not necessary comedic. Violence frenquently is of or relating to the professional depiction of comedy; humorous depiction. They are two different meanings entirely. Demonstratably different.
You used comedic wrong in relation to irony, so I thought you were using the definition that pertains to humor. So we have to start over at the irony and implication of humor, not "comedic." I'll reply to that quote so we can start over.
Correct. Irony implies comedy (comical, humorous, funny, ha ha; not depictions.). Violence does not. The reboot.