Logically, he's partly wrong. But it's a decent appeal. If these players have been in these communities that are so dangerous for the past five months, and haven't gotten it... then logically the community isn't dangerous but safe. So... they'd be going from a known safe place to an unknown place. The hope is that the unknown place is also safe, or the fear is that the current safe place becomes less safe. Which is bad either way. The healthcare though, he is spot on. Which may end up being more important in the end than just keeping safe.
Yea, herd immunity isn't achieved during a pandemic, it protects against the next outbreak. It doesn't really matter if the entire offensive line has cleared it, the quarterback isn't protected if the safety brings it right to him.
https://www.timesfreepress.com/news...-suggests-winner/529605/#.XzPZLFY_jLM.twitter Former Florida and South Carolina coach Steve Spurrier couldn't let Tuesday's actions pass without one of his verbal jabs, telling Pat Dooley of the Gainesville Sun, "The SEC and ACC should just play their seasons and winners face off for the national title because one conference was going to win it anyway."
David Ubben, my personal oracle to the football gods, has an interesting column up. And by interesting, I mean sobering. We may yet have the season cancelled.
Someone else who sees the issue of fear and control https://volswire-usatoday-com.cdn.a...-disbelieve-to-justify-control-of-the-public/
Yeah, I've said all along SEC may very well not play. But they are making a much stronger effort TO TRY TO PLAY than the B1G or Pac 12 did.
Right. Herd immunity (true HI) doesn't prevent infections, it prevents epidemics. And, it isn't a single value everywhere (differences in innate contact differences shift the susceptible fraction required to prevent outbreaks). And with superspread events can be overshot, as I've heard discussed for prisons.
