It’s moving the goal posts. All I did was make an observation he hadn’t been good so far, lol. All of his incompletions came in the first half except 1. It wasn’t 2 throws as he claimed. He had a stretch where he missed 4 guys and 2 others that could’ve or should’ve been picked which is obviously what I was referring to.
It’s gonna be like that all year for stretches. Still 70% completion rate, no turnovers and maybe 2-4 bad reads or throws.
I don’t think the ones he missed in the first half are going to be the norm. Some of those are pretty standard for him and he just missed. Wasn’t really about the touch on the throw either except the one he missed high in the middle.
thats just one of those deals imo where you are so open, the ball already feels like it’s up there forever, and with Milton add a little more forever and the brain costs you. I mentioned at the time if he had to go up and get that ball with decent coverage he catches every one of those because there’s no time to think
Yeah as long as he’s not turning it over I think you kind of live with what Joe is. He’ll be frustrating at times, but mostly I think he’ll be pretty good. Which you could honestly have said about Hooker too. A lot of revisionist history that Hendon was perfect all the time.
His touch was better than it was when he first got here. He simply played better than he did before. He stared down a receiver or two and missed some throws, but this was not the same Milton we saw before. The offense needs to improve. That is true, but this is the first game.
... you are moving them. He said it was too early, you said in context it was in the game, I am pointing out to you that his response said it was too early, so it was in fact made within the context. A normal person would say something like ya he definitely picked it up after that rough patch maybe I am just concerned about consistency. But instead you have said it was true in context even though his response was TO the context.
Wrong. Reread the exchange. He tried to say I was worrying about something when I was simply making an observation. Those are not the same. I never said I was worried about Milton. And my reply did say he played fine in the 2nd half. He went on to complete 8/9. A lot of screens there though.
Your exact statement was Milton not good today. Not Milton has had a few bad series. What does today imply?
My post was made in the first half. Stop being obtuse. He had just missed 4 throws and almost threw 2 interceptions. He had not been “good”. So not only were you wrong about “2 bad throws” you were also wrong about me worrying. He simply wasn’t good up to that point. Special teams was not good today. Am I worried about it? That can’t be inferred from my post.
Milton didn't have all that good of a day, but had he gotten a little help with some drops, it would have been a lot better. He wasn't perfect, but he wasn't terrible either.
John Adams was just pretty dead on. We feel like we’re gonna score every time we get the ball so when we have a 3 and out it just gets magnified, like, what happened? Nobody scores every possession
4 bad throws in a half, holy shit. He is bad. You do this dumb shit all the time so it's not worth arguing with you about.
6 bad throws actually. And that’s just the ones off the top of my head. 2 could’ve been picked. Take your ball and go home. You tried to put words in my mouth and come out looking like a [uck fay]ing idiot for it. I’m sorry you can’t differentiate between an observation made in the first half and someone stating they are worried about Joe Milton this season. Go [uck fay] your self. If I wanted to say I am worried about Milton then I would just [uck fay]ing said I was worried about Milton/
