11-14 in two seasons. 4-12 in the conference during that time. One bowl appearance each, one bowl loss for each. 1-1 against each other. Who is better?
If James Franklin goes 5-7/2-6 at Vandy this year, he will post exactly the same numbers as well. As this seems plausible, should he be added to the discussion as well?
He beat us with [uck fay] Matt Roark at QB. TBH, that is when my support for Dooley completely fell into a sinkhole.
You held on a lot longer than most of us. The Arkansas game was my last straw. I saw the writing on the wall when he had a month to prepare for UGA and showed zero adjustments. I was fully expecting to lose to both Vandy and Kentucky. I was hoping not too, but it didn't surprise me. Apathy set in after Arky.
Dooley. Because if I chose Joker, that would mean I would have to tolerate Randy Sanders calling the offense again.
I hate to give Joker too much credit for that win. That was like losing a soccer match 0-1 due to an own goal. Don't mistake this as a vote of confidence for Dooley.
I'd take [uck fay]ing Sanders over Chaney so do I really need to tell you how I'd vote on Joker vs. Doolander?
I'd like to award both of them zero points, and may God have mercy on their souls. I'd have to say Dooley for letting the circumstances accumulate that allowed that to happen. That game was the sprouting of the bamboo Dooley had been watering all season.
What did Joker do to win it? They pretty much ran the same play every time, and they didn't look good in the process, either.
So you're saying (bad) credit goes to Dooley and Wilcox for not adjusting appropriately, and I would have to agree. That was his chance to shove it down a team's throat and he completely blew it.
