Lol what in the actual [uck fay] are you talking about? 1. I have never stated that this instance (Breonna Taylor) is an instance of suspicion where suspicion can never be proven incorrect. I never said that. Yo nunca dije eso. Quia non sum locutus. How many other ways do you need me to tell you that I never said suspicion can never be proven incorrect in the case of Breonna Taylor for you to stop claiming I stated that suspicion can never be proven incorrect in the case of Breonna Taylor? No matter how many times you make the claim, it will still be false. If we set up cameras in Breonna Taylor's apartment and the 4 other locations that were targeted for raids, and had a way of monitoring all of her conversations, I'm sure we'd find out pretty quickly if she was involved in his business or not. It probably wouldn't be legal, but we could prove the suspicion correct or incorrect pretty quickly. Who's to say there aren't other ways of getting there? That's the entire point of investigation. 2. Therefore, your conclusion: Cannot be reached in the first place. 3. Yet again, you go back to innocent vs guilty. Have I said that Breonna Taylor was guilty of anything? Has anyone else stated she was guilty of anything? 4. Suspicion is based on evidence. The reason for the suspicion is evidence. You don't get to just create suspicion out of thin air without evidence. If someone is murdered in Nashville, TN, the police are not suspicious of the entire population of Nashville, TN. They're not suspicious of anyone until they have evidence that causes suspicion.
Indy, I've asked you to tell me what would prove the suspicion incorrect. So, again, what would prove the suspicion incorrect? If you can't tell me what would prove the suspicion incorrect, then yes, you are effectively saying it cannot be done. Surveillance, even when alive, wouldn't have proved suspicion incorrect. And now that she is dead, it damn sure can't. So, again, Indy, how, right now, today, could the suspicion be proven incorrect. And if the answer is "it cannot," then are where I have been saying you are, in a system where suspicion cannot be proven incorrect. In other words, exactly like innocence and guilt: Not guilty until proven guilty. Not involved until proven involved. Not suspicious until proven suspicious. So, Indy, again, I ask, how would suspicion be proven incorrect?
There are loads of things that are correct or incorrect that I, personally, can’t prove correct or incorrect. Doesn’t make them any less correct or incorrect. Not suspicious until proven suspicious? How do you prove someone suspicious?
Such as what? If you can't prove a construct correct, the base is true, ie: not true. Not fat until proven fat. Not drunk until proven drunk. Not stupid until proven stupid. Not x until proven x. If you can't prove x, then you're not x. You prove suspicion by finding the thing that identifies as the suspicion. "She's moving drugs." If you don't find drugs, she's not moving drugs. It doesn't matter if she might be; it isn't a could--it either is, or is not. Just like guilt. Because justice is binary. That's why you don't get "could have" possession charges, or "supposed possession" charges. You get possession charges, or nothing. If you don't prove it, it doesn't exist. And that's why its debunked.
Using the middle choice, I got the following: Here's the deal on the other side of the same thing about our kids are just a few of the other side of the same thing.
Here’s the deal. I’m not gonna was a pretty bad game I would’ve gotten a little more time with him and I didn’t really think that he’s a crazy guy and he didn’t want me in there
Here's the deal with the idea of the time of effort to be a change in the realm of the world is a very different in the responsibility change.
Here's the deal is a very long time to time and effort you put your money back from you soon to discuss the position.
Here's the deal with the Hassel of the rings extended edition dvd the best of the best for the next week and a half of the triangle is [uck fay]ing retarded. Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
Didn't know where to put this. I guess this is what happens when you live in bammer too long. You get ads like this.
