POLITICS Random Political/Legal

Discussion in 'Politicants' started by fl0at_, Jun 7, 2021.

  1. Ssmiff

    Ssmiff Went to the White House...Again

    I’ve posted about the “pashing” but was told it’s just not happening.
     
  2. Ssmiff

    Ssmiff Went to the White House...Again

    And just to point out, there sure are a lot of reports on child pornography and pedo stings in Florida going back to last year for them to supposedly only be focused on trans or Lgbtq
     
  3. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Move it elsewhere? Why? Do I need to write out a prohibition on defining pedos as warhammers?
     
  4. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    And who were the perps?
     
  5. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    It has happened more than once in the few weeks since the bathroom bill went into effect. For it allegedly being a concern regarding not wanting to see someone cleaning their penis, there sure is a focus on proving one's genitals.
     
  6. Ssmiff

    Ssmiff Went to the White House...Again

    looked varied ages, shapes and colors at quick glance, but how do you make your point about it mainly being a certain group (of course there will be a larger percent of sickos from a larger group of people) while also claiming Florida is only focused on trans and lgbtq because you they dragged a big lesbian out of a bathroom.
     
  7. warhammer

    warhammer Chieftain

    Kudos for going pedo instead of the same old tropes y'all usually break out when you can't win an argument.
     
  8. ole_orange

    ole_orange Board Simp

    The entire transgenderism thing never fails at rendering folks incapable of seeing eye to eye. Concerns found within the weeds of this entire conversation brought forth by both “tribes” are legitimate issues needing fully hashed out in a calm, non emotionally charged partisan fashion.

    Like let’s not be “bigoted”. However let’s also respect the reality of biology and acknowledge biologically born males cracking the skulls of biological women in combat sports is…well…problematic to say it kindly. Or those noting how plenty of biological women not wanting to see a “women” with a literal penis in the women’s locker room apparently makes one “transphobic” as according to the many who find themselves fully beholden/on board with all things pertaining to trans ideology. This weird ass “debate” always brings out the silly.
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2023
  9. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    1. You just made my point that the varied
    2. Any enforcement of who is using which potty is labor that is not being spent on anything useful
    3. The logic that catching pedos means everything fine would mean there is no border problem because we have so many drug busts and catch so many illegal crossings-- funny, I don't think you'd agree with that logic
     
  10. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Woosh. Over your head. My dude, that is what the wording is doing to lgbtq people. So if you think it is bullshit, then you agree with them.
     
  11. warhammer

    warhammer Chieftain

    The emperor's new point again.
     
  12. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    The horse that will not drink. Why is that? Why do you react to me giving a 1 to 1 hypothetical as being insulting, and can not see the connection to the removal of the words in Minnesota law? Insulting for you, not for them?
     
  13. lumberjack4

    lumberjack4 Chieftain

    I'm completely lost. Is the argument that pedophilia is a sexual orientation? Because that sounds dumb as hell.
     
    justingroves likes this.
  14. warhammer

    warhammer Chieftain

    I simply stated that it's a bad look when Minnesota's first trans representative in their state house introduced legislation that would strike language from their human rights act that prohibits defining adults attracted to minors as a sexual orientation. IP believes this is impossible because trans get called groomers, or something. As I stated before, we're not having any debate anywhere if the language is preserved in some fashion in that law.
     
  15. ole_orange

    ole_orange Board Simp

    Google the term "Minor Attracted Person" (aka MAPs). It's certainly not a mainstream idea championed by any mainstream group/political "tribe". Like I have no doubt that the overwhelming majority of progs/lefties/Dems (especially the card carrying lefties who participate on this board) are by no means in favor of the whole MAP concept out there.

    However unfortunately a fringe element does actually exist that insanely advocates essentially for destigmatizing pedos. A fringe that attempts to frame pedophilia as basically it's own separate and new category of sexual orientation. With the end goal point apparently being driven by their desire for society to one day eventually recognize/accept Peds as not being a totally vile and evil. "They" will claim stuff like how we all need to instead label pedophiles as merely a "Minor Attracted Person" as opposed to a more harmful, antiquated term "pedophile". Like there are even LGBT-esque Pride flags that include "Minor Attracted Persons" symbolism. It is a thing believe it or not. As a result of this reality some hard core conservative media/influencers are certainly using the whole MAP sympathy theme existing out there on the fringe as a means to attempt to largely dictate the larger public conversation/ political debate surrounding LGBTQ+++++ issues. Wild stuff.

    https://factcheck.afp.com/pride-flag-pedophiles-someone-created-one-no-one-waves-it

    https://nypost.com/2023/05/02/elon-musk-bans-user-promoting-pedophilia-flag-from-twitter/
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2023
  16. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    MAP is a rebranding of pedophile and hebephile, by pedophiles and hebephiles. Simple as that. These desires into actions are crimes and harmful to minors.
     
  17. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    They really don't need to take this from him. They have a super majority and the governorship. He is not fit for office. Remove him.

     
    emainvol likes this.
  18. zehr27

    zehr27 8th's VIP

    Finally

     
  19. ole_orange

    ole_orange Board Simp

    “The fiscal responsibility act” is the term they are calling this apparently. Lol DC, man.

    In the event this information below turns out to be the truly the case, seems like the strategy is a continuation of using temporary band aid conveniently avoiding a messy political fight debt ceiling fight through the next Presidential election cycle. Thus ensuring politically the debt ceiling chaos continues to be an annual political crisis most every year regardless of what party holds the power going forward. Uniparty gots to make sure we keep on kicking our unsustainable financial can on down the road for the rest of time.

     
  20. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    "Debt ceiling chaos." We are the only country who does this nonsense. It is an invented dog and pony show.
     
    NorrisAlan and HCKevinSteele like this.

Share This Page