I love me some RG3, and I think he'll pan out as an NFL QB. However, I heard a pundit the other day say that he would be the most athletic QB to play the position, and I want to clarify that this is incorrect. Two words: Michael. Vick. Vick is both quicker than RG3 and faster than RG3 at any distance that matters on a football field*. RG3 ran a 4.39 40. Very very good. Vick didn't run at the combine, but ran an electronically timed** 4.36 at a rookie mini-camp. I was almost certain that he also ran an electronically timed 4.33, but I can't find reliable confirmation on this. This is a silly little rant, but it bugs me when I hear people in the national media say utter nonsense. *RG3 would beat him in the 200, I'm certain. **Unless the 40 was electronically timed, I pay it no mind. Further to this point: until I see an electroically timed sub-4.2 40, I am of the opinion that it is as real as a unicorn.