This is the story that will not die. What happened, exactly? What did we and do we know, and when did we know it (or not?) Chain of events: 1) News sources report some sort of disturbance at the embassy 2) News sources/government outlets describe it as protesters 3) Protests break out in Egypt, other ME locations over a youtube movie released months ago 4) Details released by WH are sketchy, vague. Other government sources seem to release contradictory accounts 5) After two week, the original most repeated description of the event as "protesters" is replaced with "organized terrorist attack" 6) WH says it always referred to it as an attack, but details were mirky 7) Republicans claim terrorist groups claimed responsibility for the attack within hours of the event (this position was first taken over a month after the attack) 8) Bombshell email is uncovered, which claims known terror groups claimed responsibility for the attack on social media. This email is dated within hours of the start of the incident, concurrent with the continuing attack. 9) Examination of known twitter, facebook, and other social media accounts of the alleged terrorist groups reveal no claim of responsibility at any time for the attack, contradicting the email's claim.
Good summary of events with it likely that more will come out. A poorly executed cover up is underway IMO. Obama wins the election - important info disappears and investigation is stonewalled. Romney wins - it all gets swept under the rug with a reset on security at embassies. Both will allude to the need for better and more timely intel. From either mouth will come "we have learned from our mistakes ...."
There is definitely some sort of cover-up going on. I just don't think it is as simple as the election as to the reason.
Still not sure what the deal is on this. The cover-up is going to be far more damaging than the screw-up of not responding to the requests for more security. And sure does look like someone in the State Department is trying to suppress testimonies. I am not sure if Obama is in on it. If he isn't, he better get out in front on this pronto or he's going to get a serious black eye.
It sounds like a lower government official screwed up and then tried to play interference to cover up between WH and Embassy officials.
Barbeques, tattoo's for jersey's and screwing up defending an obvious terrorist attack tend to get people fired. Well, at least the first two on the list do.
I tried to figure this out but there is too much disparity in the reporting for me personally to make heads or tails of who to blame. Mistakes were most definitely made by those in the State Dept. I don't know what to think past that. White House tries to deflect criticism from Benghazi whistle-blowers - Washington Times Special ops halted from responding to Benghazi attacks, U.S. diplomat says - The Washington Post
We're likely to never know all of the details regarding this event. Accountability in certain gov't echelons rarely exists and therefore someone will eventually fall on the sword to wrap this up once and for all. Can't have those dark clouds hovering around come election time...
Depends on what you mean by 'survive' ... I believe it completely ruins her chances at a stint in the big office.
this is the reality. Being a sorry ass politico as SoS shouldn't see her imprisoned. Covering up shiz to protect the next two elections is a problem, but isn't against the law.