Yes, I think it would be a mistake to promise something that will likely never happen with the hopes of gaining an edge in the primary.
There isn't a single one of them that has a chance. I watched a clip of Beto the other day where he was asked a question and literally stared at the ground the entire time he answered. Like he spotted a twenty on the ground that nobody else did. Wasn't even the worst part, he sounded like he was high as a kite, made little sense at all. And he is the golden boy. Bless their bleeding little hearts.
They are going to have to go with Bernie. Really their only chance. An 80 year old millionaire socialist.
There exists a strong option, I'm telling you. And to quote a quasi-wise(ish) freak-a-zoid: Hide and watch.
Do you think that the Democrats are in a place to nominate a moderate that will appeal to rust belt democrats and republicans tired of Trump.
I have no pre-qualifications for a candidate on sex or race, so he’s alright as far as I’m concerned. Just as long as he doesn’t move to my neighborhood. Unless he’s married to a Hispanic or black person. We already have enough Asians for now.
I'm really not sure what bothered you about me saying democrats campaigning on reparations is a bad idea, but fine.
That's the question. I'm not sure, but I do not for a second believe the leftmost portion of the party getting all the attention at present is representative of the Democratic population and certainly not independents. There are two possible paths: either the smart elements of the party who understand what it will take to win over a cross-section of the electorate take charge or the American people force their hand. That's what happened in 2016 (GOP/national) and it can happen again. Not certain how likely, but entirely possible.