The Imbroglio Thread

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by bigpapavol, Oct 1, 2016.

Tags:
  1. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    Then I don't understand the posts to tenny trying to categorize something as threatening.

    Middle schoolers now crying "I didn't tattle!"
     
  2. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    You mean the replies to Tenny after he inserted himself into the conversation?

    How is that tattling?

    Nobody went to Tenny. Tenny came to them.

    Maybe I'm confused.
     
  3. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    Vk inserted himself to cry "bully." Our resident ivory tower dictator is " awaiting clarification" with multiple friends. Actually, looking back, thats pretty threatening in itself.

    So what is it that the left flanks wants clarification about, and why? I assumed it was for censure. Maybe they are just ****ing stupid.
     
  4. NashVol11

    NashVol11 Well-Known Member

    Cotton likes to completely misinterpret a situation and then blame everybody else for it
     
  5. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    You think Vk was crying bully, but you think it's threatening for me to want clarification before jumping to any final conclusion about what was said? Lord, you're a hypocritical ass.
     
  6. A-Smith

    A-Smith Chieftain

    Can you mods just start banning one another yet?
     
  7. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    And you are possibly the worst human being with whom I've come in contact. Are you going to get your multiple people to clarify that before deciding what should be done about me, Stalin?
     
  8. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    To my knowledge the only people ever banned from this site have been

    1. Spam bots
    2. A person spreading personal info about others
    3. Axion

    There isn't a rule about being an arrogant, ignorant, dictatorial extreme left wing asshat, so we should be good.
     
  9. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Stalin, good one.
     
  10. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    And by "extreme left wing," you mean "thinks the federal ruling regarding North Carolina's bathroom law was correct," and "thinks the police should not be above the law." So extreme.
     
  11. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    We protect our own.
     
  12. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    No. What I really mean is "believes the intelligencia should dictate how the rest of the world should live, labeling those who disagree as bigots to silence them while generally contributing nothing of actual value to anything, anywhere."

    Know anybody like that?
     
  13. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    Why did you and your multiple friends need clarification about why something said by not you to not you was a threat?

    Hypocritical--i do not think it means what you think it means.
     
  14. NashVol11

    NashVol11 Well-Known Member

    You're throwing the biggest fit of anyone in this thread. Again.
     
  15. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    Tell the teacher
     
  16. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    I didn't "need" it in the sense that some sort of impending action depended on it. I "needed" clarification in order to understand what was being implied. No need to manufacture drama. We can just wait until the next time you feel tradition is under attack or whatever.
     
  17. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    Cool!
     
  18. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    No.
     
  19. cotton

    cotton Stand-up Philosopher

    I think you do.

    Would you like some clues?
     
  20. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    The BPV / Un Imbroglio

    I'll be moving posts from the election thread to here.

    Tenny
     

Share This Page