POLITICS Democrats on Illegals / Children

Discussion in 'Politicants' started by Tenacious D, Jun 20, 2018.

  1. TennTradition

    TennTradition Super Moderator

    But he told me we HAVE to keep the parents separated from the children during criminal processing.

    I’m so confused.
     
  2. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    And the Kennedy kid, probably.

    Harris is spending money like a boss, and will likely be it.
     
  3. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    No, I laid out all three available options - of which you neither objected nor offered any others - and he’s giving you what you want...locking kids up with their parents.
     
  4. TennTradition

    TennTradition Super Moderator

    Trump told me that, not you.
     
  5. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    Well. POTUS tweeted it.

     
  6. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    Six in one hand...
     
  7. TennTradition

    TennTradition Super Moderator

    You counting Trump lies per minute, here?
     
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2018
    Tenacious D likes this.
  8. TennTradition

    TennTradition Super Moderator

    I found the following very informative in several areas. The last few points are more editorial, obviously.


     
  9. GahLee

    GahLee Director of Conspiracy Theories, 8th Maxim

    Line the border with Trump Towers and invite them all in. Free WiFi y'all.
     
    Tenacious D likes this.
  10. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    What? In early 2016 I handed you a USA Today paper that, on its front cover, showed billionaire Donald Trump entering the primaries, and you chuckled like it was the dumbest thing you’ve ever heard.

    Then we briefly discussed something or other relating to Hillary.
     
  11. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    [​IMG]
     
  12. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Trump's EO will likely face legal challenge and be struck by the courts, just as obama's was which led to the fabled "catch and release"situation. Trump will then blame the courts. Obama had tried to expand the number of judges and facilities to have processing fast enough to have the families resolved within 20 days, but republican congress refused to pass it as they wanted the crisis. Now it will be spun as a way to under ine the courts themselves, and all leveraged to pressure his own party into funding the wall. Remember this post.
     
    Tenacious D likes this.
  13. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Also, the 2300 or so kids separated already will not be reunited with parents, and some parents will be deported separately. Some of these families may be permanently destroyed for political points. That is definitely not the law.
     
  14. TennTradition

    TennTradition Super Moderator

    Does the Cruz bill essentially trying to do the same have much support?
     
  15. Ssmiff

    Ssmiff Went to the White House...Again

    Now I'm supposed to be mad that Trump signed something to begin the fix a 30 year problem? Its hard to keep up with what to complain about.
     
  16. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Remember my post. He didn't fix shit, he's maneuvering. Dumb people will fall for it.

    If this is a fix, then Obama did the same thing and was lambasted for it. It was then overturned by the courts due to the length of time of holding.

    Trump wants to completely change the system, and this is his leverage: families.
     
  17. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Don't know
     
  18. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    https://www.npr.org/2018/06/19/6210...y-separation-and-zero-tolerance-at-the-border

    He's not fixing, he's putting a hack in place of his administration's previous hack.
     
  19. justingroves

    justingroves supermod


    Welcome to American politics
     
  20. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    Surely he’s not clever enough for that.
     

Share This Page