Rail against it, just like they’re now railing against funding it, I guess. Or, figure out a way to work together on something that reasonable minds on both sides can agree, and which freezes the extremists on both sides. You can do either of these things, but only one will work.
Missouri, off the top of my head: https://www.npr.org/2018/10/03/6540...-in-missouri-following-new-state-requirements I believe several other places throughout the country face a similar situation.
Missouri, off the top of my head: https://www.npr.org/2018/10/03/6540...-in-missouri-following-new-state-requirements I believe several other places throughout the country face a similar situation.
Missouri, off the top of my head: https://www.npr.org/2018/10/03/6540...-in-missouri-following-new-state-requirements I believe several other places throughout the country face a similar situation.
Ya. So you are never more than 8 hours away. Super helpful after a procedure requiring rest to recover.
Not necessarily true I don't think. Like Missouri for example has 45 places in the surrounding states.
In an observation way, not in a stance way. I agree with your observation. You’ve seemed to disagree. But yet have no stance, when I attributed a stance. So in that way, not clear.
I would leave things the way they are now. If anything, ramp up efforts to promote and make birth control more available. I don't think there is some great need to make abortions more available or open up restrictions on them. I wish a decree could be made that it's going to stay this way and that's that and we could put it behind us as a preeminently important political issue. I think it's a fairly complicated issue that all too often gets boiled down to illogical, "The other side hates women/babies"-type motives and is a rallying cry for demonizing the opposition.
Crossing state lines for an abortion can be illegal, depending on circumstances. There is no way to spin it, abortion rights, in defiance of the SCOTUS, are eroded and suppressed throughout the country.