They've had weeks to present evidence that things weren't on the up and up. They've failed to do so, and are simply just stonewalling.
I doubt they were explicitly called racist. I imagine, instead, it went like: "Only believing ballots from black communities are in error is racist."
The people of those states have exactly as much say in an election under the current Electoral College system as does California. Which is none. This is the same as any other small state, since no one running for president gives two shits about any state other than a handful which are close. It's an absurdly idiotic system for the modern America which limits the decision making of the presidential election to about 10% or so of those who vote. And, people focus on the tiny states when this idea of the popular vote comes up, but there are better arguments people are forgetting. One is California should have a say in the election. They will have about 16 million votes in this election with the 5th largest economy in the world, if they were a country. Them not getting a shred of interest from a candidate is really ridiculous. That said, 16 million people voted in California, but 160 million, in total around the country, voted in this past election. Any candidate hoping just to ride it out in California, or even a few of the really big states is going to lose. I have little hope the EC will be scrapped, but it most definitely should and the small states argument doesn't really hold much water.
Robots will probably network and reach consensus like the geth in mass effect. They won’t need to vote. And humans will all be organic batteries anyway
