CHI, BAL, DET Lead Nation in Population Loss

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by Tenacious D, Mar 24, 2017.

  1. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    Wonder what's causing this? Happenstance? Coincidence?

    Regardless, these seem like minuscule amounts of people leaving, or am I mistaken in believing that?



    Link: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...e-lead-nation-population-loss-maricopa-county
     
  2. RockyHill

    RockyHill Loves Auburn more than Tennessee.

    I think with Chicago it's somewhat of a coincidence, or at least Chicago isn't dead or hasn't been dying a slow death since 1960.
     
  3. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    3 large cold weather cities have a lot of people leaving. Lets look at population change weighted by population before looking too hard for that sweet sweet social commentary.
     
  4. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    Seems like Tenacious already did that.
     
  5. MWR

    MWR Contributor

    Probably why he is known as "Tenacious".
     
  6. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    How did he do that? He's looking at raw population.
     
  7. Tenacious D

    Tenacious D The law is of supreme importance, or no importance

    See my second line.

    I quoted the article, without commentary (or at least didn't intend to).
     
  8. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    He quoted that Cook County only lost 20,000 some thousand out of 5.2 million and said it seemed minuscule. I think you are getting carried away.
     
  9. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    I must not be expressing myself. Divide the loss by the total. The loss in Chicago is nothing compared to many places in the midwest (has been in the past, haven't looked lately). As a whole, Americans are moving to the coasts and to warmer climates. Part of this is that America is getting older.
     
  10. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    I get that 20,000 out of 5.2 million isn't the same as 20,000 out of Knoxville. I think it was pretty self-evident in post 1.
     
  11. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    If it is clear that Chicago shrank by 00.4% while cities in the Midwest and interior south are shrinking at more than 1%, okay. So why isn't pine bluff, AR in the OP? Shrunk 6% from 2010 to 2015.
     
  12. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    I think that would be a better question for the author of the article.
     
  13. y2korth

    y2korth Contributor

    The stats can be spun however one wishes.

    It is a minuscule amount.

    Imho
     

Share This Page