Christie closes lanes on bridge to get back at major

bizarre

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ristie-office-involved-in-controversial-lane/

 

From the linked article:

 

Truly bizarre. I suppose these shenanigans are more common than I want to believe.

 

Why people still email such things is beyond me.

 

it really is amazing how lazy and dumb people are.

 

I'm sure this happens all of the time, and second, it won't mean a thing in 2016. If Christie runs, he wins, imo.

 

Agreed on your first two statements. I am sure this goes on regularly, and I am sure it won't matter by 2016. He can just say he had no knowledge of this and there is enough reasonable doubt that he didn't.

Not sure about the last statement. He's got a good chance, but Hill-dog will be a tough out.

 

I agree about Hillary but I thought she was having second thoughts? I would love to see them on the same ticket actually.

 

Hill-dog is gonna run away with this thing. She'll run. She's just not going to come out with it before midterms, would be my guess.

 

How is politically different from a democrat aside that he has an R beside his name?

 

Okay ... I guess the Republican's can trot out a tea party favorite and proceed to get the shit kicked out of them in the elections. I'd rather at least have a moderate R ... a centrist, if you will. I'm sick and ****ing tired of the extreme factions of both parties.

 

seems like a strange way to get back at someone.

 

Schweitzer v. Christie would be the most entertaining campaign ever.

 

MCain, Dole, and Romney ran as moderates and got their ass kicked.

 

Read earlier that her super-PAC netted $4M this year alone (and the money machine hasn't even cranked up, yet) - but the only one who can stop her is Biden, and he has less than 5% chance.

Christie has a lot of unknowns. Intentional unknowns, that is.

Hillary will have to beat herself.

 

Not really.

They tried to go more moderate after going far right to win the primary. They all doomed their chances with the radical right primary stuff, imo.

It's fine with me if the GOP keeps presenting far right after far right (or having to go far right in the primaries to get the nomination) candidates. That means more wins for the Dems. It boils down to 25% are voting Republican- no matter what. 25% are voting Democrat- no matter what. The battle is with the remaining center folks & radicals do not resonate with that group. It's a matter of numbers.

 

what????? McCain, dole, and Romney are as far left as any republicans in the entire party.

 

Re-read my post. I never said they were far-right.

Edit: I can see where I was unclear. I'm claiming the far-right switch in the primary poisons them whether they are far right or not. Like I said, keep having the most conservative competition during primaries. I'll take the wins.

 

would be an awful dumb tactic given the fact the far right guys never win. i'm not sure what views you are referring to. Romney's problem is he came off as the rich out of touch dude he actually was. Obama is no less out of touch, but clearly much better at hiding it.

 

I agree- even with the Obama point- but if you don't see the "Who Can Spout the Most Conservative Position Contest during the primaries, I don't know what to say.