Human Stem Cells + Animal Embryos = Ethical Conundrum

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by gcbvol, Nov 6, 2015.

  1. gcbvol

    gcbvol Fabulous Moderator

    This is a fascinating topic. Do the potential medical benefits outweigh the risk, even if small, of introducing something akin to human consciousness in animals? I tend to believe most of these concerns are highly unlikely, but what if? No matter one's personal morality this is a challenging question.

    NPR: should-human-stem-cells-be-used-to-make-partly-human-chimeras
     
  2. NorrisAlan

    NorrisAlan Founder of the Mike Honcho Fan Club

    I have not read the article yet, but your statement of "human consciousness in animals" implies it isn't already there. Which I argue it is, just at lower levels.
     
  3. justingroves

    justingroves supermod

    I'm saying don't screw with it, but it's not really due to morals.

    It's due to the fact humans will inevitably make something awful.
     
  4. NorrisAlan

    NorrisAlan Founder of the Mike Honcho Fan Club

    [​IMG]
     
  5. gcbvol

    gcbvol Fabulous Moderator

    Right, Norris. That's a great point. The fact we may not understand the consciousness in other species does not negate its existence. There is an overt homosapien centric bend to this topic, no doubt, so maybe a better clarification is a consciousness with recognizable human characteristics.
     
  6. gcbvol

    gcbvol Fabulous Moderator

    I think that's a very real concern. Like an amalgamation of Butch and Dooley awful.
     
  7. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    aren't we just talking about intelligence?
     
  8. NorrisAlan

    NorrisAlan Founder of the Mike Honcho Fan Club

    Great. Now I will have nightmares all weekend. Thanks, man.
     
  9. A-Smith

    A-Smith Chieftain

    Wouldn't it be cruel to create something that is part human in order to do research on it. Or am I misunderstanding?
     
  10. zero-sum

    zero-sum New Member

    It is, and though I struggle with certain aspects I support the research.

    Responsible oversight
     
  11. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    I think it relates to this idea that if a human created it, it is subject to the whims of human control. It wouldn't exist otherwise, so we have dominion over it.

    Michael Crichton hinted at such a mentality in the second Jurassic Park novel, but with extinct animals. But it points to the same thing--we made it, or brought it back, therefore we can do whatever we want to it.
     
  12. Volmaul

    Volmaul New Member

    I guess it depends on which part is human. Grow a human liver in a pig and I'm good. You've got bacon and a transplant.
     
  13. zero-sum

    zero-sum New Member


    Crichton's infatuated w/ this kinda stuff iirc, he directed the movie version of Cooks best seller "Coma" based on another highly controversial subject
     
  14. NorrisAlan

    NorrisAlan Founder of the Mike Honcho Fan Club

    2nd season of ST:TNG had a good show on this, Measure of a Man. IP has mentioned this episode before.
     
  15. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Agreed. Humans are animals. If that weren't true, we wouldn't ever worry about the flu.
     
  16. technovol

    technovol New Member

    I just looked at my list of worries and flu didn't make the cut.
     
  17. A-Smith

    A-Smith Chieftain

    Clearly you're not living in a third world country then.
     
  18. A-Smith

    A-Smith Chieftain

    True. I'd be okay if we were sure we had the technology to isolate like this.
     
  19. Volst53

    Volst53 Super Moderator

    On the other side of the same coin is that we're the only animal that can worry about the flu.
     
  20. A-Smith

    A-Smith Chieftain

    I get this to an extent. But "whatever we want" seems strong. I mean we also domesticated the dog. There wouldn't be any creatures that watched every move we make and wanted to spend every single second in our presence if we hadn't created them.
     

Share This Page