http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal adjective 1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs. 2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform. 3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism, especially the freedom of the individual and governmental guarantees of individual rights and liberties. 4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties. 5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers. 6. of or relating to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies. 7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
hold up. your silly response about conservatism meaning do nothing was about definition of the word? odd that you'd mix thinking like that to make liberalism sound like it's about equality and liberty when in your context it simply means for change. Hmmmm.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conservative 1. disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change. 2. cautiously moderate or purposefully low: a conservative estimate. 3. traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness: conservative suit. 4. (often initial capital letter) of or relating to the Conservative party. 5. (initial capital letter) of, relating to, or characteristic of Conservative Jews or Conservative Judaism. 6. having the power or tendency to conserve or preserve. 7. Mathematics. (of a vector or vector function) having curl equal to zero; irrotational; lamellar.
so the political party didn't show up here as it did to refute your liberal commentary. I like that. You construed this to mean do nothing? I assume you're kidding and potentially bright enough to understand that preserving our constitution is an active endeavor.
Your often-repeated comment makes me think of this: http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-the-myth-of-classical-liberalism-1086.html
modern liberalism, or as it operates in the US today, has nothing at all to do with the first paragraph. Not even close.
How do you get that from my comments? I'm not just for free markets, which neither major party wants now. I think I've stated numerous times about social liberties as well.