Don't know if any have seen this but this is ridiculous. http://ktla.com/2014/06/26/nightmare-nanny-wont-move-out-3-weeks-after-being-fired-upland-couple/
I have a client who owns apartment buildings in Los Angeles and he's had a squatter for 1 year that he hasn't been able to evict. Getting someone evicted in Los Angeles with the rent control laws is impossible. Especially if they have children and are here illegally
Meh. They wanted to get a free live-in nanny. Then they wanted to dismiss her onto the street at a moment's notice. I am not in favor of squatters, but they sound like [Richards].
I personally would never have a live in, someone outside of family that is, so this is all odd to me. Hire someone that comes in for part of the day or if you have it a guest house, but never let them live in the main home.
Sounds like she didn't uphold her end of the bargain and is a leech. This is why you never Craigslist a nanny BTW, let an agency draw up a contract and prevent this kind of crap.
Providing someone shelter, food, etc. in exchange for work is getting something for free?!? Might explain your willingness to give public assistance away so freely.
It doesn't give a person a lot of options down the road. Maybe they should have just build her a little shack in the back. Or just under the house, like you see with the colonial houses in North and South Carolina. It is her stupidity for accepting, but this in essence servitude. If you call this employment, so was slavery.
I'm saying they were stupid to make an arrangement that doesn't involve paying someone. You tell me: where should she go, with no notice? This whole incident has been 3 weeks. Most states, you have to give someone 1 month's notice as it is. But they know she has no income because they are her "employer" and don't pay her.
She is 64 years old; do you think there is a chance that she could be getting Social Security? Any chance that she does not want wages so as to not cut her SS benefits?