POLITICS Random Political/Legal

I would think someone so interested in biology would know what Swyer and Klinefelter syndromes are, but here we stand

 

Because these esteemed "Institutions of Knowledge" have earned the right to usurp the social and cultural contracts humanity has agreed to since the beginning of time. I'm certainly not the most knowledgeable, but I'm self aware enough to know that I have no right to arrogantly demand that society must redefine the meaning of man and women based on my feelings.

 

That’s easy. Sir Orloff Broloff.

 

To be clear, you can't give me an example of a biological male giving birth to another human.

 

Might want to back up from “humanity” a bit, as there are a whole load of examples of cultures that do not, in fact, agree with what you are saying here

 

You appear to be unfamiliar with intersex people. Completely. https://www.healthline.com/health/baby/what-does-intersex-look-like#appearance

I sincerely hope you do a little research on this, it is not as rare as you'd think.

 

Yea tons of cultures where dudes were the ones tasked with giving birth. Got me.

 

We share more than 50% of our genes with a banana. I have taught a biology class.

 

Humanity never agreed on a social and cultural contract. There are many cultures who acknowledge third genders, "two spirit people," etc. In Plato's writing, he postulates that there were 3 genders. You are mistaking YOUR beliefs for "beliefs." You are arrogant as [uck fay] to think your definition is the definition, and to think other views are just due to feelings.

 

Women are "tasked" with giving birth? I know women who have not, will not, and/or can not give birth. So that isn't how that works.

 

Where in the post I quoted did you say a word about giving birth?

I have already pointed out culturally different takes on gender. You said gender and sex are the same thing way up there, so men and women are the “genders” and as I have already provided an example of one of many cultures that do not subscribe to the idea of only two genders, I’d say that shoots the whole “humanity argument” right in its penis (or maybe uterus, or maybe both depending on other biological factors).

 

Those aren’t women, they are just dudes with tiny [Richards]

 

Because these rare cases and gender dysphoria are the same thing.

 

You can't keep your story straight. You said gender and sex were interchangeable, but now you are specifically saying "biological male" as a straw man attempt. I am the one who said they were not interchangeable. I should only need to find a person who gave birth who lives as a man. Or has male body parts. Keep it straight, YOU say they are all the same. Not me.

 

Are you a banana? If not, why?

 

Hold up, so they don’t matter because they are rare?

What percentage of the population is trans? It’s pretty rare right? Yet your boy Walsh argues that they take away opportunities from other women.

Shouldn’t matter though, since it’s so rare and all

 

You seem to have a hard time keeping your line of logic straight. You claimed gender and sex are the same. Not me. You did. Demonstrating that sex is not "XX, XY" destroys the notion that binary gender is locked to XX, XY since that is definitely, biologically, not necessarily binary. I am not saying they are necessarily the same thing, I am showing that there is more variability than the rigid biological model you have falsely claims exists.

 

Whoa, you are the one whose position is allegedly based in biology. Does a banana have a gender? If not, why not?

 

I don't believe gender is a non-binary fluid spectrum. I believe that people such as yourself believe that gender is a non-binary fluid spectrum based on feelings, whereas I don't. Not complicated.

 

Totally forgot a banana is a mammal. You set me straight