Disagree, female NC still not an excuse to strike If a dude, have at it Yes. No. Chicks get the pass. Dude should've walked away.
To go along and agree with such a blanket rule? Absolutely I need more. Because the issue I"m hammering here is that encouraging females to punch males in the face when they so desire is bad. Nobody wants to be in a position where some girl is punching at you and you can either try to tie her up, which is never a clean operation, or you can like run away in the other direction but i"m sorry if I don't enjoy superszing my servings of emasculation, or you can punch the [itch bay] in the face once. Option 3 doesn't sound like a terrible option really. And especially when we consider thta options 1 and 2 will just encourage more female punchiness which will set up another situation where option 3 is on the table for consideration. So really a man who decides to respond by popping a girl in the face is just doing risk prevention for the future. he should get a medal.
Zero only wants girls so he can teach them to be lean, mean, consequence free, abusive machines. **** or slit, if you're willing to throw a punch, you better be ****ing willing to take a punch. Double standards are never good.
Actions have consequences and while there are multiple possible reactions to a girl throwing a punch throwing one back is perfectly acceptable to me. Don't start something your not prepared to finish. Being a woman doesn't absolve one from the repercussions of their actions. Like I said in an earlier post, don't want none, don't start none.
I have not seen the rash of women hitting men. It seems to me that most follow basic human civility without the need for negative reinforcement. I would be willing to bet that there are a lot more men hitting women without the provocation of a punch than women hitting men.
In that case it's wrong. Just like a dude hitting a dude unprovoked is wrong. Just like a woman hitting a woman unprovoked is wrong.
