You'd think what was found would be more important than how they were found, considering the subject.
You mean the claims which were completely baseless and refuted as legitimate, even by Comey himself? Hell, even CNN had the journalistic integrity to not run the story. Let's not now make it muddled, seemingly unknowable or something that it wasn't.
What happens if it's determined that the guy is indeed a "respected source on Russia" as has been said? The guy isn't backing down from his work.
If you're implying that the FBI was coordinating with the Clinton campaign, that implication holds as much water as a cup made from a screen door. You can thank the FBI in a significant fashion for President Trump after their announcement they were looking into the emails found on Weiner's computer. If they were indeed in cahoots with the Clinton's to deny Trump, they are the worst conpirators ever. All that info would have been leaked out BEFORE the elections and no way does Comey send that letter days before the election. You're grasping here, if this is the point you're trying to make, imo.
