You missed the transportation/socioeconomics element. I can live in a literal desert and get water. That doesn't mean water access is not an issue in a literal desert.
No, it disproportionately does. Is this going to be one of these stone cold facts that get people's panties in a bunch like it can't be true because it would mean that they are not actually the ones walking the furthest to school up hill both ways in life? Does it undermine the personal narrative of pulling one's self up by bootstraps and anyone could do it but others are just not as hard-working? What's the deal here?
What does that have to do with right and wrong? Only matters if you perceive a harm when people lie on purpose to mislead?
The rate at which they are vaccinated lags other demographics. This is due to access and socioeconomic factors.
There cannot be a wrong, without a harm. This is a basic tenant of Western philosophy. What exactly is the lie, and how are you certain it was done on purpose?
Do these patterns pick up on people just not getting the vaccine because they don't want to or don't care?
Alaska is mostly wilderness, but where the people are, they mostly are all there. There is also a large percentage of science and government workers. And because there aren't many people there, they hit their allotment pretty quick. I don't know much about the demographics of West Virginia.
I dont agree with your first statement. Lying is wrong, no matter if you deem harm is done or not. And they cut the interview into pieces to manipulate what was reported, so if you dont think it was done intentionally to support an agenda, you can certainly have your own opinion. I've been talking about media control for a couple years and pointing out those that have been controlled, dont seem to be aware or care.
I see no media control, over anything. I see paranoia by a lot of people, because they can't follow change. If you lie to yourself, you haven't harmed anyone. As such, lying is logically proven to not be wrong; how it is used, however, can be wrong. They cut the interview, but all the words were still there. It's 60 minutes, not 6 hours. It has to be cut. But even in the short interview, Desantis lays out a solid defense, that disproves 60 minutes assertion. Even in the chopped interview, he defends himself successfully. Which just makes 60 minutes look bad.
