If this were the class, no one is getting extra credit. Still interesting, and it really does highlight the underlying human tendency that creates so many problems.
I actually actively sought extra credit in two classes. 1. 6 grade science. I had an off day, grabbed the wrong folder before class, didn't have my class outline, we had a 4 question pop quiz open note, I got both backwards and made a 0. 2. Senior year of college, Accounting Information Systems. Same thing. Bad day, got stuff crossed, big assignment due, I didn't have it. I just packed my stuff up and walked out of class.
It's like the old GSN show Friend or Foe. Do both parties agree to split the cash or do they try to take it all?
I games the hell out of one of my professors. Every year she gave extra points at thanksgiving for canned food, guess which guy didn't have to take the final
It is irrelevant. You can help ensure 2 points for everyone including yourself, or triple that reward only for yourself at the risk of losing 2 points for everyone. Mathematically and logically, there is only one right answer: take the sure 2 points for everyone. Human nature is, you're special and everyone else isn't "clever" enough to ask for the 6 points.
Doesn't matter. 2 sure points or high risk of no points if very many other people are desperate like you. Let's say there are 100 people in the class, and 40 are making a B or higher. Everyone else is going to want those 6 points. If they have the attitude of "but I need it," no one is getting any points. This exercise is brilliant in laying bare this problem in human behavior.
It's not irrelevant. It's risk reward. If I know I'm 3-6 points away from a grade change, I'm risking the the chance on having a positive effect on my grad than a neutral one.
Plus it matters at the time of the semester the choice is given. Early on I bet more take the sure two, but later in the game I'd be riskier if I needed more than two.