China mass stabbing: Deadly knife attack in Kunming

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by OrangeEmpire, Mar 5, 2014.

  1. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-26402367

     
  2. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    ban assault knives
     
  3. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Wow.
     
  4. DirtyVol

    DirtyVol New Member

    Beat me to it
     
  5. Indy

    Indy Pronoun Analyst

    I agree with what has already been said.
     
  6. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Just so I understand, a mass stabbing proves what about mass shootings exactly? If you are saying "See? Mass killings still happen, and maybe things would have been less bad if someone good had a gun," then you are admitting a gun is superior than a knife and a mass killing would be worse with a gun involved. Crazies are gonna crazy. If knives were the match of guns, no one would be fighting gun control because they'd be relying on knives for self-protection.
     
  7. Unimane

    Unimane Kill "The Caucasian"

    How in the hell do you stab 130 people? Did they just line up for him?
     
  8. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    I'm assuming it was a crowd and there was confusion.
     
  9. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    I think it was a group of 5 people.
     
  10. Indy

    Indy Pronoun Analyst

    I think most people are saying that if someone wants to murder people, they are going to do it even without access to guns.
     
  11. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    And which is a more lethal and effective tool, Indy? Do you bring a knife to a gun fight?
     
  12. InVolNerable

    InVolNerable Fark Master Flex

    If it's one on one and close proximity fighting, then yes.
     
  13. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    I bring a gun to ward off the Samurai. I practice with my gun to ward off the people with guns who don't practice. Neither is more effective than the other. One provides reach.
     
  14. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Who doesn't rely on both?

    Who's admitting what? Or are you just forced to take the radical left position? The point is that people kill people. The tool isn't the main problem.
     
  15. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Is it radical to take the position that a gun has more of a capacity to kill in a mass killing than a gun? That is radical?
    The last two sentences are mine, you can't argue with me by repeating what I posted first in this thread. Because that is called "agreeing," you radical leftist!
     
  16. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Made no sense, anywhere.
     
  17. utvol0427

    utvol0427 Chieftain

    Overlooking the sensible solution, ban Asians.
     
  18. snoball5278

    snoball5278 Contributor

    step 1, step 2, repeat x130

    [​IMG]
     
  19. snoball5278

    snoball5278 Contributor

    [​IMG]
     
  20. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    You want to argue, but you don't have a point to make.
     

Share This Page