Elon Musk is in “Bonkersland”?

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by Tenacious D, May 25, 2018.

  1. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    My take was that the way Musk was quantifying "bots" was different than how Twitter did. And that they both were probably reasonably accurate within their framing. Musk was counting bots cumulatively, whereas Twitter was counting/estimating active bots it had not yet detected/removed.
     
  2. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    tech jobs?
     
  3. zehr27

    zehr27 8th's VIP

    I think it might be Elon derangement syndrome. He may very well tear the company down over time but his track record shows he likely will have some success and keep it alive. Time will tell.
     
  4. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    there are certainly more ways to succeed than to fail with a brand like twitter and I don't think the mainstream conversation on it seems to grasp that. Like I said earlier.
     
  5. zehr27

    zehr27 8th's VIP

    Amazon delivery drivers
     
  6. zehr27

    zehr27 8th's VIP

    Fair
     
  7. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    I do think there are some tech folks who are about to have to hunt for a job in ways they never did before.
     
  8. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    big tech’s been laying a lot of people off. The fed is trying to torpedo the labor market. At some point supply has to be greater than demand especially where twitter headquarters is.
     
  9. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    Well twitter has never really made money and they definitely seemed overstaffed. The way he’s going at it seems likely twitter survives.
     
    zehr27 likes this.
  10. The Dooz

    The Dooz Super Moderator

    At the time, apparently everyone was locked out of the building, therefore nobody was left to monitor or fix issues that arise. The thought was that it would eventually glitch out quit working. Though later in the night they said the building would open back up in a few days.
     
  11. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    aren’t most of the workers remote anyway?
     
  12. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    I have been saying that too. If you are worried about revenue, shedding thousands of expensive staff probably helps as much as it hurts so long as the lights stay on.
     
  13. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    yeah it’s not the way to grow the company but it’s certainly also not the way to destroy it either
     
  14. zehr27

    zehr27 8th's VIP

    Everything has to be done inside that building. That was made clear by the threat of it glitching and possibly shutting down while people were locked out of a building they apparently never go to.
     
  15. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    As if one really needed in, you wouldn't just break the door.
     
  16. zehr27

    zehr27 8th's VIP

    Basically a private equity approach. Run it lean and mean and find the profit.
     
    droski likes this.
  17. Volst53

    Volst53 Super Moderator

    I’m sure they had who they needed and wanted in the building.

    it’s pretty clear there’s a lot of astroturfing going on with twitter and who the hell knows what’s really going on
     
  18. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    All my buddies that work for big tech are currently still remote. Which is true for most people I know here too but more so for tech.
     
  19. zehr27

    zehr27 8th's VIP

    How is there not a hide a key?
     
  20. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    employees are butthurt and reacting to everything like buttburt people do.
     
    zehr27 likes this.

Share This Page