IRS never targeted conservative groups

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by IP, Oct 6, 2017.

  1. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Uh, the disparity is more than accidental and this was absolutely political. Directly refuted by other reports and completely contradicted by the actions of the DOJ and its fully political leader. Keep peddling this read it absurdity as if this piece of trash is more telling than the actual actions of individuals involved.
     
    dc4utvols likes this.
  2. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Okay. Then file charges against the people behind this report. Republican Congress and President. Do it. It's all bogus, right? They're in charge.

    The entire point is that the DOJ and Treasury acted based on a quick preliminary review. That review reached inaccurate conclusions.
     
  3. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Why? They paid. They apologized. They were dirty, just like their boss. The prelim review supports the outcomes way better than this worthless piece of trash, which damns them as well.
     
    dc4utvols likes this.
  4. JayVols

    JayVols Walleye Catchin' Moderator

    [​IMG]
     
  5. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    This came out now. Prosecute. They just lied, right?
     
  6. dc4utvols

    dc4utvols Contributor

    LOL
     
  7. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Uh...are you lost?
     
  8. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Are you? This report came out last month. You're saying it is inaccurate and lies because of a settlement decided upon based on a preliminary report years ago.

    So prosecute. The Trump Administration's Treasury Department just lied.
     
  9. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    Why were people pleading the fifth if there was nothing going on?
     
  10. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    The report has the answer
     
  11. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Short version, the preliminary report found from a small sampling that a majority of rejections were conservative groups. However, a complete review found them to be a very small minority of rejections
     
  12. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    That doesn't explain anything.
     
  13. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    You’re clearly lost. The legal system doesn’t work off of any of these bs flimsy ass political reports. You ever been in an org with an IG?
     
  14. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    What a crock.
     
  15. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    What is it that needs explaining?
     
  16. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Then. Prosecute.
     
  17. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    yes, they settle on things they shouldn't all. the. time.
     
  18. bigpapavol

    bigpapavol Chieftain

    Especially when they’re innocent. People retire too. Now, about that IG.
     
  19. kptvol

    kptvol Super Moderator

    Why plead the fifth if the facts bear out you are innocent?
     
  20. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Because they already settled. Under tremendous pressure from Congress, which wanted blood before a full investigation could possibly be completed. (This is political. Shocking)
     

Share This Page