You are reading it wrong. He is saying that people at the time said the game was surrendering and letting integration happen and it would destroy the game, and it didn't. It was his last sentence that is complete nonsensical idiotic drivel.
I read it as some people thought that and fought against it, but it didn't kill the game like the naysayers said it would. But idk.
France gets a bad rap. Unleash the Germans against anyone in the world in 1940 and it's a royal ass kicking.
Idk, the 2nd Army covering the withdrawal at Dunkirk seemed to be intent on killing Germans. Too little too late in the grand scheme, of course.
France had the largest army on earth in 1940. They should have put up a better fight. That’s easy for me to say though. I didn’t watch almost every man I know die in a ditch in WW1
I wonder what it's like for someone that has so little understanding of football to watch a game. Is it just complete chaos to them from the snap until the guy with the ball is tackled then repeat a couple of hundred times? Maybe smiff can weigh in.
That's phenomenal stuff. Confidently believing they just stumbled upon a completely original but obvious thought.
Players should just run faster and git 'im. Why don't they just git 'im? THROW THE BALL! Just throw it! Gawh! You gotta git 'im. Don't let him do that.