Hillary Clinton sought to contrast the war in Iraq with the intervention in Libya during her stint as secretary of state. “I’ve said Iraq was a mistake,” Clinton told Chris Matthews during an MSNBC town hall event on Monday night. “Libya was a different kind of calculation. And we didn’t lose a single person. We didn’t have a problem in supporting our European and Arab allies in working with NATO.” https://www.yahoo.com/politics/hillary-clinton-we-didnt-lose-a-single-person-in-142322732.html
"... we didn’t lose a single person." She seems to have forgotten about an Ambassador and some security folks.
To be fair she was specifically talking about Operation Odyssey Dawn, which was the operation to overthrow Qaddafi, not the aftermath.
Of course not, just pointing at that the context of the conversation with Chris Matthews was the operation to topple Qaddafi.
He doesn't have a super pac (unless you consider the nurse's union one, which if so whatever). He got cease-and-desist letters from the Sanders campaign last year right from the start, and they've publicly stated his group was illegal and causing harmful confusion. Their statement about his arrest was that they "were not surprised." Try to not make stuff up.
Sounds like Bernie's camp could not have done any more to prevent this, or distance themselves from it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...nated-to-bernie-sanders-super-pac-or-a-fraud/ (notice the date) http://www.publicintegrity.org/2015...bernie-sanders-super-pac-just-dupe-james-bond (notice the date) This site has links to the actual letters sent. http://thebernreport.com/bernie-sanders-sent-super-pac-a-cease-and-decist-letter-in-june/ Stating or insinuating this super pac was in any way connected to the campaign is dishonest. This guy and his super pac is an example of the type of stuff Sanders is campaigning against, despite Peterson's claims or intentions.
Which Republican Candidate said this: “But if you believe we can all rise together, if you believe we’ve finally come to the point where we can put the awful legacy of the last eight years behind us and the 7 years before that when we were practicing trickle-down economics and no regulation in Washington, which is what caused the crash, then you should vote for _______ ." "her" - Bill Clinton http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-bill-clinton-slams-awful-legacy-of-last-8-years/
A video shows Chelsea Clinton blasting the "crushing costs" of President Barack Obama's signature legislation. In the video, Chelsea Clinton tells a crowd that her mother, Hillary Clinton, is open to using executive action to reduce "crushing costs" of Obamacare. http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2001707
can't be true. I keep hearing that it was net neutral to the gov't. I'm sure the average citizen sees his premium increases as net neutral, after the benefits eroded massively or their deductibles skyrocketed while their premiums increased at well over 50%. Seems neutral.
Due to those blowouts in the West in the last round, Sanders has been able to stubbornly avoid mathematical elimination. He needs a +10 or more win in Wisconsin to be sufficiently closing the gap as to be a threat. Not sure that he gets that, though I do think he will win the state. He just lost way too much ground in the South, which is disappointing seeing as how those are all going to go Republican anyway. If he can hang around, he has shot at making some magic by being close in NY and taking California. Tall orders, but he keeps hanging around...