Green Bay Packers

What was your point then. You're the one who made the asinine claim the Ravens would take Flacco over Rodgers.

 

Consistency doesn't matter? He's a top 10 qb, but he ain't in Rodgers, Brees, Brady, or manning's league

 

Not really. Would the Dilfer led team have traded for Manning in his prime? Yes.

Rodgers and Flacco are close enough, and both have won their team a Super Bowl, that I don't think the Ravens would bite.

 

No actually they're not really that close at all.

 

He's had the #1 d in the nfl every year he's been a qb. Compare that to having the worst d in the league and putting up similar win loss records.

 

That I knew how many rings each one of them has.

 

Just noticed no Seahawks.

Would take Wilson over Kaep and Flacco.

 

Ok.

 

Who is #2?

 

Flacco somewhere in the middle of Dilfer and Rodgers, slightly closer to the latter.

All jmo tho

 

Eh..................they aren't that close.

 

I am not saying he is better than Rodgers, but the year AR won a ring, the defense was lights out at the end of the season and through the playoffs.

 

Manning, Brady, and Rodgers are the top.

 

you have to be trolling.

 

Don't know about that. Wilson hasn't looked that great in a while.

Of course, there is the receiver thing there, too.

 

Sorry, Kaep or Flacco

 

Kaep

 

They just gave him a 100mil+ contract. They're not trading him for anybody, realistically or hypothetically. You don't have to agree with it. I don't have to either, but it is what it is.

 

they are both flawed. I guess keep for the running ability. though he's only averaged 29 yards per game over his career. hardly enough to pick him over anyone.