Discussion in 'Politicants' started by IP, Apr 30, 2017.
I moved on in 5 minutes after Obama won. Didn't post a word about it for 8 years.
I don’t give a hot damn what the Democrats do, and in a bit, no one else will, either.
That what happened? Impeachment?
You’re [uck fay]ing high. I threw a damned party.
I cannot fathom a more slanderous and thoroughly routing insult to his intellect than your having complimented it.
Come on you Constitutional Scholars who claim this is not Political. Explain how Alan is wrong??
Not sure I read this here. Nm old article
This weird cult shit around Trump is completely nuts.
I'm not sure what this said, but all impeachment, every time, is political.
Let's see if this is as bad of a shit show as the House proceeding. I expect it will be.
That was an ugly first day.
Just because I'm curious (not that it would happen), could Trump be removed from office right now... and then be sworn in due to winning 2020?
I think so. I don't think he is banned from holding office, right?
That'd be kinda funny.
That is correct.
agreed. dems are losing their mind.
Yes, the Dems are the ones with officials making dumbass statements appropriating MLK Day to provide a self-serving idiotic defense of Dear Leader. Meanwhile, Schiff goes on the floor of the Senate to make a cogent, detailed and effective case for removal and Trump's motley crew of laywers spreads their usual falsehoods.
So, no, I was right the first time.
Schiff is not the best person to have making the Dems case. He is a jackass.
Like Schiff? The evidence proves Trump is guilty and must be removed from office. We need additional witnesses.
21 Republican State Attorney Generals filed a “friend of the Senate” brief for Trump’s impeachment trial.
From that brief:
(No emphasis, none needed)
Minding the posted and public dates of each, one could almost wonder if the first was merely a rough draft of the other.
What a terrible curse it is, indeed, to see the world so clearly.
You're right, lawyers never call additional witnesses during a trial. Never happens.
But the evidence he has present so far is so overwhelming; according to him.
But he must have witnesses.
You are right; no contradiction there.
It has been pretty solid evidence and laid out very well by Schiff yesterday, but the witnesses could close any sort of daylight for opposition.
Wait, who am I kidding? Republicans don't give a [uck fay] about any of this and would acquit no matter the circumstances, evidence, etc.
Like I said, "The Cult".
Separate names with a comma.