SEC Network

Discussion in 'Vols Football' started by CardinalVol, Apr 12, 2013.

  1. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    Only if the SEC and ESPN choose to live by DirecTV's rules.
     
  2. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    The Big 10 and Mountain West didn't ask for idiotic carriage fees and prime spots in basic packages.
     
  3. CardinalVol

    CardinalVol Uncultured, non-diverse mod

    What carriers have the PAC12 Network. I know Dish, what else?
     
  4. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    the big 10 absolutely did. the pac-12 and big 10 deal are virtually identical except that the pac 12 charged less per subscriber.
     
  5. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    Dish has to take those channels in a pathetic, desperate attempt to compete against a vastly superior product.
     
  6. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    comcast and time warner and uverse. i was surprised direct tv gave it the middle finger given the fact that los angeles is it's headquarters and still is a very large percentage of their base.
     
  7. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    i've had both and the only superiority is the nfl ticket and maybe the dvr (not by much though). 10 years ago you would be correct.
     
  8. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    The Big 10 merits what they asked for. Their ratings justify it, as well as the access Rutgers and Maryland give them to the New York and DC markets. Also, it's part of the sports package. It's not part of any basic package. The PAC 12 and SEC have both asked to be treated like one of the ESPNs or FS1. That's ludicrous.
     
  9. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    The Big 10 has a deal and the PAC 12 doesn't. Don't see anything "virtually identical" about that.
     
  10. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    if you live in big 10 country you get it on the basic package. same thing for the pac-12.
     
  11. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    Why give national placement to a product that people in the home region don't give a damn about?
     
  12. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    Again, there is no same thing. The PAC 12 rightfully has no deal.
     
  13. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    and the mountain west got a deal too despite absolutely no one wanting it. i'd say the difference is direct tv has decided the cost isn't worth the lost number of subscribers. before they wanted to be known as the sports providor. obviously they've changed their mind.
     
  14. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    they certainly care about the dodgers and they didn't get that one either and btw college football is the nfl in LA.
     
  15. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    i agree the pac-12 asked for too much money. my only point is the big 10 asked for too much money as well (as evidenced by the fact direct tv was virtually the only providor that had it in it's first year), but direct tv still payed for it.
     
  16. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    Or, they realize the truth. The Big 10 merits inclusion on the terms they have and the PAC 12 and the SEC can accept those or be excluded.
     
  17. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    i guarantee you the SEC has more loyal viewers than the big 10.
     
  18. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    People actually watch the Big 10. The fact everyone joined in adding them behind DirecTV should tell you something.
     
  19. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    people watch the sec too
     
  20. hatvol96

    hatvol96 Well-Known Member

    All of whom can get every meaningful game played in their league on CBS or ESPN. The SEC Network, like the PAC 12, is a money grab praying on the fringe element of fandom.
     

Share This Page