The Other Shoe Dropping?: Sanders (should be) Suing DNC

http://money.cnn.com/2010/09/08/news/economy/reagan_years_taxes/

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/08/opinion/the-great-taxer.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...8a33e4c-4555-11e2-8061-253bccfc7532_blog.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/04/AR2011020403104.html

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_09/the_biggest_tax_hike_in_modern032511.php

http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/26/ob...on-bush-opinions-columnists_higher_taxes.html

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425106/reagan-trump-and-taxes

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_new...unt-republicans-as-they-eye-fiscal-cliff?lite

Surely one of these you would consider to be unbiased.

 

The DNC caved: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...m_content=FullStory&ncid=newsltushpmg00000003

If what the DNC and Clinton campaign are claiming is true, they should have no problem with bringing in an independent firm to assess the security and procedures involving party files. Wonder what they're afraid of? The Sanders campaign is the one in the wrong, right? It's a good move not to back down from the lawsuit. Let's put some sunshine on this.

 

You are an embarassment.

The ****ing govt isn't a good enough source for you? If taxes didn't go up after the biggest drop in American history what further evidence do you need? Yeah the raised cigarette taxes. Woopie! Shouldn't the greatest tax increase in American history show you know an actual increase in the tax rate overall?

 

Did you read these actual articles that talk about the greatest tax cuts in history? My god.

You are linking articles that talk about increasing taxes on cigarettes while maintaining the largest income tax cut in American history which where the vast majority of tax income comes from. I'd that's the greatest tax increase in American history, sign me the **** up for some of that!

 

There is nothing I love more on this site than when IP and Droski start whipping out the graphs. It's a wonderful 8th pastime.

 

Did you read the articles? Every one of them refers to the large tax increase in 1982.

Keep it personal droski, it makes your argument look so much stronger than it is.

 

Show me the money!!!!!!! Every one refers to the large tax cuts and then mentions some minor tax increases. Forgive me for thinking the largest tax increase in American history would show you know an actual increase in the tax rate.

 

If you pay attention, you learn a lot

 

Or absolutely nothing, depending on which one presented the graph and which one you ask.

 

I like it when Lyle gets a raise and/or extension

 

I hear he's getting a nice bonus if he keeps it within 17 of Northwestern.

 

Is that what the spread is?

 

Yep

 

Perfectly stated.

 

So?

 

It actually is. Liberals have had 30 years to assail Reagan policy and still can't make it work, even if they ignore that Tip was the biggest socialist POS possible.

 

The narrative of what Reagan policy was doesn't reflect reality.

 

Out of curiosity, how old were you during his Presidency?

 

I was born at the end of his first term. I don't see how that is relevant.

 

Let's break down what you're saying here.

You claim I made the opposite argument about the "Obama tax increases." This was the issue in which you call them "tax increases" because Obama didn't extend the cut beyond what the bill called for.

Now you are inherently equivocating it with Reagan passing a new bill that removed some of his cuts that would have occurred in the coming years and are saying that ISN't a cut. My argument with Obama was that him doing nothing is not the same as a tax increase. You felt it was.

My argument with Reagan is him passing new bills taking away or ending his cuts is a tax increase, you feel it isn't.

You're the one who has no consistency on this.