White teacher wins discrimination lawsuit

100 percent! Holy shit!

 

Everyone can have a gun; thus making your "with power" clause irrelevant.

IP to attempt a rescue in 3, 2, 1...

 

Other than the fact that it's been noted on a number of occasions in this thread that it can be applied to minorities, but, **** it, why ruin your agenda, huh?

 

Or, anyone can become racist, thus validating my "with power" clause.

 

Ok then why use that caveat in the first place?

The hate whitey professor pulling the agenda card is hilarious btw

 

The hell with it.

Kill WHITEY!!!!

 

Fyp

 

If applied fairly, there's nothing wrong with his definition. It doesn't minimize racism by minorities under the way Uni has been using it in this discussion. He's been fair about it.

 

Because it is like saying that racism is prejudice "with water" (or anything else available to all). Why have the caveat?

 

Horseshit. Why mentioned it at all then?

 

Because there's a large discrepancy between types of prejudice. For an extreme example, a slave who hated white people is at a much different degree of prejudice than a slave owner who hated black people. Saying they're both racist isn't an accurate representation of their status or situation. And, again, it isn't like prejudice is good or irrelevant when someone is "merely" prejudiced. It just means they aren't able to use their prejudice against anyone to any effect.

 

Yes, calling me a hate whitey professor certainly doesn't suggest any kind of agenda.

 

Bump

 

Then not just say there are different levels of racism? When you say certain people aren't racist you can't see how that appears to downplay their actions to something inconsequential.

 

Does that simply bring it to, hate due to color is racism because anyone has the ability or power.

 

Bump for VolDad.

 

If I taught economics i certainly wouldn't be offended if you called me a supply and demand professor.

 

You would think.

 

Because it's entirely reasonable to use different words to describe different situations. If some people can't, don't want or are unable to determine the difference, that doesn't mean the word loses it's meaning.

 

I'm kind of thinking that one has a little more of a negative connotation than the other and more representative of an agenda, as well.