Yes people kill people, but do we really need easy access

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by droski, Dec 14, 2012.

  1. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    Gun control is the argument, no? You want limited firearm deaths?

    Not quite sure why you are enamored with "assault" weapons
     
  2. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    Really?

    What do you base this on?
     
  3. CardinalVol

    CardinalVol Uncultured, non-diverse mod

    From wsj.com -

     
  4. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Then you are an idiot. And have apparently forgotten Virginia Tech.
     
  5. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    Next leak will be "armor"
     
  6. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    I'm enamored with anything that can easily kill a lot of people quickly. All i've been arguing is why make it easier for these nutjobs? i don't think it's possible to eliminate firmarm deaths in this country.
     
  7. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    People fighting back with any thing available to them saved countless lives at Va Tech.
     
  8. CardinalVol

    CardinalVol Uncultured, non-diverse mod

    Now they are saying his father is feared dead too.
     
  9. IMISSTHEBOWLBROS

    IMISSTHEBOWLBROS Contributor

    Gun safes, Permits and proper instruction.....nothing more to say! If everything is done legally from the purchase to the take home........ then it's up to the individual to educate themselves..
     
  10. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

  11. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    Where do you stop?

    Bows, crossbows, knives, cleaning products, fertilizer, etc?

    What is realistic?

    Regulation?

    Elimination?
     
  12. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    Grasping for straws?

    If you dont know any thing about firearms, then own it.
     
  13. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    doesn't this kind of assume everyone is a stable human? You and I would be fine with handguns around. Hell we'd probably be safer. But off the top of my head I can think of at least 4 of my wife's teacher friends who i'd be terrified of them having a handgun in any type of stressful situation.
     
  14. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    Cluster of information at this point.
     
  15. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    you think you'd be able to get off 24 killing crossbow shots before someone stopped you? take a look at the knifing article from above. how many fatalities?
     
  16. IMISSTHEBOWLBROS

    IMISSTHEBOWLBROS Contributor

    I need my guns ...nobody is looking out for my family ... when the Law Enforcement is strecthed to thin with not enough budget and officers! Because the big "IF" somthing happens
    I will do things to protect my family! Period! OE knows what I am talking about!
     
  17. OrangeEmpire

    OrangeEmpire Take a chance, Custer did

    At an elementary school with a lockdown situation, I would say yes to mass casualties.
     
  18. fl0at_

    fl0at_ Humorless, asinine, joyless pr*ck

    Ok, so now you are advocating a ban on all weapons? Ok, got it. Just making sure.

    So my 1851 navy colt is out. Has a rotating cylinder. Can technically speed load it.

    Hell, dro, just which firearm are you all in favor of supporting? A sweet 16, single barrel break down shotgun with a ban on owning more than 1 round?

    Just say you are anti firearm and be done with it.
     
  19. IMISSTHEBOWLBROS

    IMISSTHEBOWLBROS Contributor

    I think you should be allowed to carry any where as long as you have the proper permits to do so!
     
  20. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    it appears to me you are arguing semantics.
     

Share This Page