Obama: Maybe it's time for mandatory voting

Discussion in 'The Thunderdome' started by OrangeEmpire, Mar 19, 2015.

  1. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    we require an ID to get into a bar, to fly, to get employed, to open any sort of account, to do anything at the dmv or at basically any other govt office. that doesn't fall under the definition of something being "restrictive" to me.
     
  2. Beechervol

    Beechervol Super Moderator

    Granny would say gas or bleach would get that off.
     
  3. Beechervol

    Beechervol Super Moderator

    "Restrictive" is a farce and a bailout IMO regarding the topic.
     
  4. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    Gotta socially engineer it. Make it a point of pride. Then require it. If we can require voter ID's, why not ink?
     
  5. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    go head and do it. if someone has their finger inked are we going to have the 80 year old lady at the voting booth send them away? that'd be funny
     
  6. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    You still have to sign in these days. You flag the name. Hell, we both know if we computerized this more pedestrian voter fraud would get difficult to go undetected. It'd only be hi tech fraud that would be concerning.

    I don't see why we can't have computerized voting that prints out a receipt of your vote for you to verify, then put into a paper ballot, followed by an exit poll. If there is any question concerning the computerized voting numbers, check the paper ballot.
     
  7. droski

    droski Traffic Criminal

    there have to be tons of ways to do it properly.
     
  8. JohnnyQuickkick

    JohnnyQuickkick Calcio correspondent

    can't buy a damn bottle of Nyquil at Kroger without it
     
  9. kmf600

    kmf600 Energy vampire

    They should pay people to vote or at least give people food, cable TV or cell phones to vote.
     
  10. lylsmorr

    lylsmorr Super Moderator

    Surely he isn't serious about this.
     
  11. Unimane

    Unimane Kill "The Caucasian"

    None of those things are rights or they have IDs serve a specific purpose in order to resolve some kind of tangible issue.
     
  12. syndicate

    syndicate Well-Known Member

    Ever try to buy a gun without an ID?
     
  13. Unimane

    Unimane Kill "The Caucasian"

    Also a response to a specific problem. Like I said, I don't have a problem with IDs to vote for an actual problem, but not as a solution in search of a problem.
     
  14. JayVols

    JayVols Walleye Catchin' Moderator

    The thing we all should agree on is that everyone that is eligible to vote and wants to do so, should be able to vote with as little encumbrance as possible. Additionally, those that are not eligible to vote should not be able to vote. Right?
     
  15. Beechervol

    Beechervol Super Moderator

    Absolutely.

    "As little encumbrance as possible" is where most of the disagreement happens. Especially if we are going to attempt the prevent as much fraud from happening as we can.
     
  16. IP

    IP Super Moderator

    We roll cards out with a census. Might help get it to everyone.
     
  17. kmf600

    kmf600 Energy vampire

    Eligible people should be able to vote 2-3 times at least.
     
  18. Volst53

    Volst53 Super Moderator

    Truly a giant in the field of constitutional law
     

Share This Page